Multidisciplinary Design Optimization through process integration in the AEC industry: Strategies and challenges

被引:32
|
作者
Diaz, Hector [1 ]
Alarcon, Luis F. [1 ]
Mourgues, Claudio [1 ]
Garcia, Salvador [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Civil Engn, Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
[2] Inst Tecnol & Estudios Super Monterrey, Sch Civil Engn, Campus Monterrey,Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey, Mexico
关键词
Building Information Modeling; Process Integration and Design Optimization; Multidisciplinary Design Optimization; Parametric Modeling; Component Interoperability; Architecture-Engineering-Construction; MDO requisites; ZERO-ENERGY BUILDINGS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTS; EXPLORATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recently Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) has emerged in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry to assist designers in making the design process more efficient, by achieving more design alternatives in less time. Currently, MDO is developed with software tools that work together and automatically. However, the technical requisites to develop MDO using Process Integration and Design Optimization (PIDO) platforms are not clearly specified in the design optimization literature. There are many difficulties not covered by the literature: especially the tools' behavior, and the strategies to deal with PIDO. To determine the technical requirements, the tools' behavior, the challenges of interoperability and viable strategies, we reviewed the literature and tested five tools. This paper presents the main behavior of the tools we studied, and explains the challenges and strategies to develop MDO through PIDO. We observed three technical tool requisites: component interoperability, tool automation, and model parameterization capabilities. We detected low openness levels of the tool interfaces that did not always enable a full integration with PIDO or permit access to model properties. The scarcity of commands and the presence of pop-up menus impeded performing analyses automatically. Moreover, most of the tools did not allow parametric associations among components, compatibility among themselves or the addition of custom components. The strategies proposed focused on testing the tool interfaces, to validate that each computational process runs automatically, and to confirm that parametric relationships and components are possible: The tools tested were not specifically designed to include full capability to work with PIDO, therefore, enhancements would be needed to meet the three requisites: component interoperability, automation and parameterization. Technological, documentation and programming challenges also emerged when working with tools. We demonstrated that only certain tools can be used with a PIDO platform. However, there may be still other requisites for MDO using different methods that can become the focus of future work. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 119
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Multidisciplinary mission design optimization for space launch vehicles based on sequential design process
    Shu, Jung-Il
    Kim, Jin-Wook
    Lee, Jae-Woo
    Kim, Sangho
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2016, 230 (01) : 3 - 18
  • [12] Integration of Improvement Strategies and Industry 4.0 Technologies in a Dynamic Evaluation Model for Target-Oriented Optimization
    Gallego-Garcia, Sergio
    Groten, Marcel
    Halstrick, Johannes
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [13] Challenges in evaluating strategies for reducing a building's environmental impact through Integrated Design
    Leoto, Ricardo
    Lizarralde, Gonzalo
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 155 : 34 - 46
  • [14] MULTIDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION DURING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PROCESS: A SURVEY ON DESIGN METHODS OF CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS
    Zheng, C.
    Le Duigou, J.
    Hehenberger, P.
    Bricogne, M.
    Eynard, B.
    DS 84: PROCEEDINGS OF THE DESIGN 2016 14TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, 2016, : 1625 - 1634
  • [15] Multidisciplinary concurrent optimization framework for multi-phase building design process
    Muthumanickam, Naveen Kumar
    Duarte, Jose Pinto
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, 2023, 37
  • [16] Solar Species: Energy Optimization of Urban Form Through an Evolutionary Design Process
    Giostra, Simone
    Kamalia, Ayush
    Masera, Gabriele
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [17] Challenges of RES with Integration of Power Grids, Control Strategies, Optimization Techniques of Microgrids: A Review
    Eluri, Himabindu
    Naik, M. Gopichand
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (01): : 1 - 19
  • [18] Advancing landscape sustainability science: key challenges and strategies for integration with landscape design and planning
    Qiu, Jiangxiao
    Nassauer, Joan I.
    Ahern, Jack
    Huang, Lu
    Reed, James
    Ding, Shaogang
    Guo, Jie
    Liu, Zhifeng
    Ou, Weixin
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    Shi, Peijun
    Tao, Yu
    Yang, Rui
    Zheng, Xiaodi
    Wu, Jianguo
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2025, 40 (02)
  • [19] Enabling large-scale multidisciplinary design optimization through adjoint sensitivity analysis
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    Kennedy, Graeme J.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 64 (05) : 2959 - 2974
  • [20] Facility Layout Design through Integration of Lean Manufacturing in Industry 4.0 context
    Chakroun, A.
    Zribi, H.
    Hani, Y.
    Elmhamedi, A.
    Masmoudi, F.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (10): : 798 - 803