Multidisciplinary Design Optimization through process integration in the AEC industry: Strategies and challenges

被引:32
|
作者
Diaz, Hector [1 ]
Alarcon, Luis F. [1 ]
Mourgues, Claudio [1 ]
Garcia, Salvador [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Civil Engn, Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
[2] Inst Tecnol & Estudios Super Monterrey, Sch Civil Engn, Campus Monterrey,Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey, Mexico
关键词
Building Information Modeling; Process Integration and Design Optimization; Multidisciplinary Design Optimization; Parametric Modeling; Component Interoperability; Architecture-Engineering-Construction; MDO requisites; ZERO-ENERGY BUILDINGS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTS; EXPLORATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recently Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) has emerged in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry to assist designers in making the design process more efficient, by achieving more design alternatives in less time. Currently, MDO is developed with software tools that work together and automatically. However, the technical requisites to develop MDO using Process Integration and Design Optimization (PIDO) platforms are not clearly specified in the design optimization literature. There are many difficulties not covered by the literature: especially the tools' behavior, and the strategies to deal with PIDO. To determine the technical requirements, the tools' behavior, the challenges of interoperability and viable strategies, we reviewed the literature and tested five tools. This paper presents the main behavior of the tools we studied, and explains the challenges and strategies to develop MDO through PIDO. We observed three technical tool requisites: component interoperability, tool automation, and model parameterization capabilities. We detected low openness levels of the tool interfaces that did not always enable a full integration with PIDO or permit access to model properties. The scarcity of commands and the presence of pop-up menus impeded performing analyses automatically. Moreover, most of the tools did not allow parametric associations among components, compatibility among themselves or the addition of custom components. The strategies proposed focused on testing the tool interfaces, to validate that each computational process runs automatically, and to confirm that parametric relationships and components are possible: The tools tested were not specifically designed to include full capability to work with PIDO, therefore, enhancements would be needed to meet the three requisites: component interoperability, automation and parameterization. Technological, documentation and programming challenges also emerged when working with tools. We demonstrated that only certain tools can be used with a PIDO platform. However, there may be still other requisites for MDO using different methods that can become the focus of future work. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 119
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROCESS INTEGRATION AND DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF A CLASSROOM BUILDING
    Flager, Forest
    Welle, Benjamin
    Bansal, Prasun
    Soremekun, Grant
    Haymaker, John
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 14 : 595 - 612
  • [2] Disaster-Resilient Design of Manufacturing Facilities Through Process Integration: Principal Strategies, Perspectives, and Research Challenges
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    Sengupta, Debalina
    Pistikopoulos, Efstratios N.
    Sammons, Jeff
    Eljack, Fadwa
    Kazi, Monzure-Khoda
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 1
  • [3] Multidisciplinary design optimization of the diesel particulate filter in the composite regeneration process
    Zhang, Bin
    E, Jiaqiang
    Gong, Jinke
    Yuan, Wenhua
    Zuo, Wei
    Li, Yu
    Fu, Jun
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 181 : 14 - 28
  • [4] Integrative chemical product design strategies: Reflecting industry trends and challenges
    Smith, Beverly V.
    Ierapepritou, Marianthi G.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 34 (06) : 857 - 865
  • [5] Designing in complexity: Simulation, integration, and multidisciplinary design optimization for architecture
    Gerber, David Jason
    Lin, Shih-Hsin Eve
    SIMULATION-TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 90 (08): : 936 - 959
  • [6] THE ROLE OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION (MDO) IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF COMPLEX ENGINEERING PRODUCTS
    Papageorgiou, Athanasios
    Olvander, Johan
    DS87-4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN (ICED 17), VOL 4: DESIGN METHODS AND TOOLS, 2017, : 109 - 118
  • [7] Multidisciplinary design optimization of aircraft wing using commercial software integration
    Benaouali, Abdelkader
    Kachel, Stanislaw
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 92 : 766 - 776
  • [8] Model of multidisciplinary simulation integration in helicopter rotor blade design process
    Zhang, Chen
    Zhang, Liyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2014, 27 (03) : 229 - 241
  • [9] Multidisciplinary design optimization through use of stochastic mutation algorithm
    Hong, Seng M.
    Thiele, Gary A.
    Penno, Robert P.
    MODELING AND SIMULATION FOR MILITARY APPLICATIONS, 2006, 6228
  • [10] Process Integration and Design Optimization technologies for modelling improvement
    Azzouzi, E-Mehdi
    Iuliano, Mariangela
    Hammadi, Moncef
    Plateaux, Regis
    Marchand, Francoise
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ISSE), 2016, : 179 - 183