Peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery versus open radical hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
作者
Hoegl, Jorge [1 ]
Viveros-Carreno, David [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Palacios, Tatiana [5 ]
Gallego-Ardila, Andres [6 ]
Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro [7 ]
Estrada, Erick Estuardo [8 ]
Noll, Florencia [9 ]
Krause, Kate [10 ]
Baiocchi, Glauco [11 ]
Minig, Lucas [12 ]
Grillo-Ardila, Carlos Fernando [13 ,14 ]
Pareja, Rene [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Este Dr Domingo Luciani, Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Caracas, Venezuela
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Clin Univ Colombia, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Ctr Tratamiento Invest Canc Luis Carlos Sarmiento, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Hosp Infantil Univ San Jose, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Vicerrectoria Invest, Bogota, Colombia
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX USA
[8] Hosp Gen San Juan Dios, Gynecol & Obstet, Guatemala City, Guatemala
[9] Hosp Sanat Allende, Ginecol Oncol, Cordoba, Argentina
[10] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[11] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Medellin, Colombia
[12] Valencian Inst Oncol IVO, Gynecol Oncol, Valencia, Spain
[13] Univ Nacl Colombia, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Bogota, Colombia
[14] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Grp Invest Clin & Epidemiol Canc, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
cervical cancer; adenocarcinoma; peritoneum; laparoscopes; laparotomy; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PATTERNS; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2022-003937
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing minimally invasive or open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. MethodsThe MEDLINE (accessed through Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Clinical Trials, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from inception up to April 2022. Articles published in English were considered. The included studies reported on patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA-IIA squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and/or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix who underwent primary surgery. Studies had to report at least one case of peritoneal carcinomatosis as a recurrence pattern, and only studies comparing recurrence after minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery were considered. Variables of interest were manually extracted into a standardized electronic database. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022325068). ResultsThe initial search identified 518 articles. After the removal of the duplicate entries from the initial search, two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the remaining 453 articles. Finally, 78 articles were selected for full-text evaluation; 22 articles (a total of 7626 patients) were included in the analysis-one randomized controlled trial and 21 observational retrospective studies. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 60.9%, and the tumor size was <4 cm in 92.8% of patients. Peritoneal carcinomatosis pattern represented 22.2% of recurrences in the minimally invasive surgery approach versus 8.8% in open surgery, accounting for 15.5% of all recurrences. The meta-analysis of observational studies revealed a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.74, p<0.05). ConclusionMinimally invasive surgery is associated with a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1504
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Care of Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Knisely, Anne
    Gamble, Charlotte R.
    St Clair, Caryn M.
    Hou, June Y.
    Khoury-Collado, Fady
    Gockley, Allison A.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Melamed, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 537 - 543
  • [42] Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shazly, Sherif A. M.
    Murad, Mohammad H.
    Dowdy, Sean C.
    Gostout, Bobbie S.
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 138 (02) : 457 - 471
  • [43] The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
    Leitao, Mario M.
    Zhou, Qin C.
    Brandt, Benny
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Sioulas, Vasileios
    Mager, Katherine Lavigne
    Shahin, Mark
    Bruce, Shaina
    Black, Destin R.
    Kay, Carrie G.
    Gandhi, Meeli
    Qayyum, Maira
    Scalici, Jennifer
    Jones, Nathaniel L.
    Paladugu, Rajesh
    Brown, Jubilee
    Naumann, R. Wendel
    Levine, Monica D.
    Mendivil, Alberto
    Lim, Peter C.
    Kang, Elizabeth
    Cantrell, Leigh A.
    Sullivan, Mackenzie W.
    Martino, Martin A.
    Kratz, Melissa K.
    Kolev, Valentin
    Tomita, Shannon
    Leath III, Charles A.
    Boitano, Teresa K. L.
    Doo, David W.
    Feltmate, Colleen
    Sugrue, Ronan
    Olawaiye, Alexander B.
    Goldfeld, Ester
    Ferguson, Sarah E.
    Suhner, Jessa
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 (03) : 417 - 424
  • [44] A meta-analysis of treatment for early-stage cervical cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical trachelectomy
    Lv, Zi
    Wang, Yu-ying
    Wang, Yu-wen
    He, Jun-jie
    Lan, Wen-wei
    Peng, Jia-ying
    Lin, Zi-han
    Zhu, Ruo-fei
    Zhou, Jie
    Chen, Zi-qi
    Jiang, Ying-hui
    Yuan, Yi
    Xiong, Jian
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [45] Robotic-assisted radical resection versus open surgery for cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Jianlin
    Wang, Lei
    Yu, Feng
    Wang, Lunbin
    Leng, Zhengwei
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [46] Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gottlieb-Vedi, Eivind
    Kauppila, Joonas H.
    Malietzis, George
    Nilsson, Magnus
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Lagergren, Jesper
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (06) : 1005 - 1017
  • [47] Comparison of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xue, Zhuowei
    Zhu, Xiaolu
    Teng, Yincheng
    CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 38 (05) : 1841 - 1850
  • [48] Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van Hilst, Jony
    Korrel, Maarten
    de Rooij, Thijs
    Lof, Sanne
    Busch, Olivier R.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Kooby, David A.
    van Dieren, Susan
    Abu Hilal, Mo
    Besselink, Marc G.
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (05): : 719 - 727
  • [49] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Esagian, Stepan M.
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Skarentzos, Konstantinos
    Katsaros, Ioannis
    Tsoulfas, Georgios
    Molena, Daniela
    Karamouzis, Michalis V.
    Rouvelas, Ioannis
    Nilsson, Magnus
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [50] The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Du-Jiang
    Xiong, Jun-Jie
    Lu, Hui-Min
    Wei, Yi
    Zhang, Ling
    Lu, Shan
    Hu, Wei-Ming
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)