Peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery versus open radical hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
作者
Hoegl, Jorge [1 ]
Viveros-Carreno, David [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Palacios, Tatiana [5 ]
Gallego-Ardila, Andres [6 ]
Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro [7 ]
Estrada, Erick Estuardo [8 ]
Noll, Florencia [9 ]
Krause, Kate [10 ]
Baiocchi, Glauco [11 ]
Minig, Lucas [12 ]
Grillo-Ardila, Carlos Fernando [13 ,14 ]
Pareja, Rene [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Este Dr Domingo Luciani, Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Caracas, Venezuela
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Clin Univ Colombia, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Ctr Tratamiento Invest Canc Luis Carlos Sarmiento, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Hosp Infantil Univ San Jose, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Vicerrectoria Invest, Bogota, Colombia
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX USA
[8] Hosp Gen San Juan Dios, Gynecol & Obstet, Guatemala City, Guatemala
[9] Hosp Sanat Allende, Ginecol Oncol, Cordoba, Argentina
[10] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[11] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Medellin, Colombia
[12] Valencian Inst Oncol IVO, Gynecol Oncol, Valencia, Spain
[13] Univ Nacl Colombia, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Bogota, Colombia
[14] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Grp Invest Clin & Epidemiol Canc, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
cervical cancer; adenocarcinoma; peritoneum; laparoscopes; laparotomy; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PATTERNS; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2022-003937
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing minimally invasive or open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. MethodsThe MEDLINE (accessed through Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Clinical Trials, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from inception up to April 2022. Articles published in English were considered. The included studies reported on patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA-IIA squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and/or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix who underwent primary surgery. Studies had to report at least one case of peritoneal carcinomatosis as a recurrence pattern, and only studies comparing recurrence after minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery were considered. Variables of interest were manually extracted into a standardized electronic database. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022325068). ResultsThe initial search identified 518 articles. After the removal of the duplicate entries from the initial search, two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the remaining 453 articles. Finally, 78 articles were selected for full-text evaluation; 22 articles (a total of 7626 patients) were included in the analysis-one randomized controlled trial and 21 observational retrospective studies. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 60.9%, and the tumor size was <4 cm in 92.8% of patients. Peritoneal carcinomatosis pattern represented 22.2% of recurrences in the minimally invasive surgery approach versus 8.8% in open surgery, accounting for 15.5% of all recurrences. The meta-analysis of observational studies revealed a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.74, p<0.05). ConclusionMinimally invasive surgery is associated with a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1504
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The role of older age and obesity in minimally invasive and open pancreatic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van der Heijde, N.
    Balduzzi, A.
    Alseidi, A.
    Dokmak, S.
    Polanco, P. M.
    Sandford, D.
    Shrikhande, S. V.
    Vollmer, C.
    Wang, S. E.
    Besselink, M. G.
    Asbun, H.
    Abu Hilal, M.
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2020, 20 (06) : 1234 - 1242
  • [32] Simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Taliento, C.
    Scutiero, G.
    Arcieri, M.
    Pellecchia, G.
    Tius, V.
    Bogani, G.
    Petrillo, M.
    Pavone, M.
    Bizzarri, N.
    Driul, L.
    Greco, P.
    Scambia, G.
    Restaino, S.
    Vizzielli, G.
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (04):
  • [33] Quality of life after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shan, Leonard L.
    Saxena, Akshat
    Shan, Bernard L.
    Morris, David L.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2014, 23 (04): : 199 - 210
  • [34] Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    van Workum, Frans
    Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R.
    Baranov, Nikolaj
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    Rosman, Camiel
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 33 (08)
  • [35] Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Laparotomy for Interval Debulking Surgery of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis
    Zeng, Siyuan
    Yu, Yongai
    Cui, Yuemei
    Liu, Bing
    Jin, Xianyu
    Li, Zhengyan
    Liu, Lifeng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [36] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Mengting
    Dai, Wei
    Si, Yuexiu
    Shi, Yetan
    Li, Xiangyuan
    Jiang, Ke
    Shen, Jingyi
    Ying, Liying
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [38] Minimally invasive surgery techniques in pelvic exenteration: a systematic and meta-analysis review
    Srinivasaiah, N.
    Shekleton, F.
    Kelly, M. E.
    Harji, D.
    Malietzis, G.
    Askari, A.
    Aalbers, A. G. J.
    Alberda, W.
    Antoniou, A.
    Austin, K. K.
    Beets, G. L.
    Berg, P. L.
    Beynon, J.
    Bosman, S. J.
    Brunner, M.
    Burger, J. W. A.
    Campain, N.
    Christensen, H. K.
    Coscia, M.
    Colquhoun, A. J.
    Coyne, P.
    Daniels, I. R.
    Davies, R. J.
    de Wilt, J. H. W.
    Denost, Q.
    Deutsch, C.
    Dietz, D.
    Duff, M.
    Eglinton, T.
    Fearnhead, N.
    Frizelle, F. A.
    Garcia-Sabrido, J. L.
    George, M. L.
    Gentilini, L.
    Griffiths, B.
    Harris, D. A.
    Evans, M.
    Heriot, A. G.
    Hohenberger, W.
    Hoe, C. M.
    Holm, T.
    Kanemitsu, Y.
    Chan, K. K. L.
    Kim, H.
    Koh, C. E.
    Kok, N. F.
    Kontovounisios, C.
    Law, W. L.
    Laurberg, S.
    Lee, P.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (12): : 4707 - 4715
  • [39] Influence of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in minimally invasive surgery of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Scutiero, G.
    Vizzielli, G.
    Taliento, C.
    Bernardi, G.
    Martinello, R.
    Cianci, S.
    Riemma, G.
    Scambia, G.
    Greco, P.
    EJSO, 2022, 48 (10): : 2112 - 2118
  • [40] Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Rossetti, Diego Oreste
    Ditto, Antonino
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Mosca, Lavinia
    Scaffa, Cono
    Maggiore, Umberto Leone Roberti
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Sabatucci, Ilaria
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) : 402 - 410