Peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery versus open radical hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
作者
Hoegl, Jorge [1 ]
Viveros-Carreno, David [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Palacios, Tatiana [5 ]
Gallego-Ardila, Andres [6 ]
Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro [7 ]
Estrada, Erick Estuardo [8 ]
Noll, Florencia [9 ]
Krause, Kate [10 ]
Baiocchi, Glauco [11 ]
Minig, Lucas [12 ]
Grillo-Ardila, Carlos Fernando [13 ,14 ]
Pareja, Rene [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Este Dr Domingo Luciani, Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Caracas, Venezuela
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Clin Univ Colombia, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Ctr Tratamiento Invest Canc Luis Carlos Sarmiento, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Hosp Infantil Univ San Jose, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Vicerrectoria Invest, Bogota, Colombia
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX USA
[8] Hosp Gen San Juan Dios, Gynecol & Obstet, Guatemala City, Guatemala
[9] Hosp Sanat Allende, Ginecol Oncol, Cordoba, Argentina
[10] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[11] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Medellin, Colombia
[12] Valencian Inst Oncol IVO, Gynecol Oncol, Valencia, Spain
[13] Univ Nacl Colombia, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Bogota, Colombia
[14] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Grp Invest Clin & Epidemiol Canc, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
cervical cancer; adenocarcinoma; peritoneum; laparoscopes; laparotomy; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PATTERNS; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2022-003937
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing minimally invasive or open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. MethodsThe MEDLINE (accessed through Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Clinical Trials, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from inception up to April 2022. Articles published in English were considered. The included studies reported on patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA-IIA squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and/or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix who underwent primary surgery. Studies had to report at least one case of peritoneal carcinomatosis as a recurrence pattern, and only studies comparing recurrence after minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery were considered. Variables of interest were manually extracted into a standardized electronic database. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022325068). ResultsThe initial search identified 518 articles. After the removal of the duplicate entries from the initial search, two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the remaining 453 articles. Finally, 78 articles were selected for full-text evaluation; 22 articles (a total of 7626 patients) were included in the analysis-one randomized controlled trial and 21 observational retrospective studies. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 60.9%, and the tumor size was <4 cm in 92.8% of patients. Peritoneal carcinomatosis pattern represented 22.2% of recurrences in the minimally invasive surgery approach versus 8.8% in open surgery, accounting for 15.5% of all recurrences. The meta-analysis of observational studies revealed a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.74, p<0.05). ConclusionMinimally invasive surgery is associated with a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1504
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
    Roeseler, Jona
    Wolff, Robert
    Bauerschlag, Dirk O.
    Maass, Nicolai
    Hillemanns, Peter
    Ferreira, Helder
    Debrouwere, Marie
    Scheibler, Fueloep
    Geiger, Friedemann
    Elessawy, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17)
  • [22] Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery
    Guerra, Francesco
    Giuliani, Giuseppe
    Iacobone, Martina
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Coratti, Andrea
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (11): : 4346 - 4356
  • [23] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Eric Jinyi
    Kabir, Tousif
    Zhao, Joseph J.
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 46 (01) : 235 - 245
  • [24] Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chang, Jasmine Hui Er
    Xu, Hongyun
    Zhao, Yun
    Wee, Ian Jun Yan
    Ang, Joella Xiaohong
    Tan, Emile Kwong-Wei
    Seow-En, Isaac
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2024, 409 (01)
  • [25] Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in high-risk histologic endometrial cancer patients: A meta-analysis
    Kim, Nae Ry
    Lee, A. Jin
    Yang, Eun Jung
    So, Kyeong A.
    Lee, Sun Joo
    Kim, Tae Jin
    Shim, Seung-Hyuk
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 (02) : 236 - 244
  • [26] Three and Five-Year Mortality in Ovarian Cancer after Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jochum, Floriane
    Vermel, Muriel
    Faller, Emilie
    Boisrame, Thomas
    Lecointre, Lise
    Akladios, Cherif
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 18
  • [27] Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Harriott, Camila Bras
    Angeramo, Cristian A.
    Casas, Maria A.
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 164 (06) : E233 - E254
  • [28] Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Ling
    Chen, Yali
    Zheng, Ai
    Tan, Xin
    Chen, Hengxi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (09): : 4466 - 4477
  • [29] Pattern of relapse in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy as primary treatment. Minimally invasive surgery vs. open approach. Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Manzour, Nabil
    Nunez-Cordoba, Jorge M.
    Chiva, Luis
    Chacon, Enrique
    Boria, Felix
    Vara-Garcia, Julio
    Rodriguez-Velandia, Yessica P.
    Minguez, Jose A.
    Alcazar, Juan L.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 164 (02) : 455 - 460
  • [30] Minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for the resection of colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmad Ozair
    Amelia Collings
    Alexandra M. Adams
    Rebecca Dirks
    Bradley S. Kushner
    Iswanto Sucandy
    David Morrell
    Ahmed M. Abou-Setta
    Timothy Vreeland
    Jake Whiteside
    Jordan M. Cloyd
    Mohammed T. Ansari
    Sean P. Cleary
    Eugene Ceppa
    William Richardson
    Adnan Alseidi
    Ziad Awad
    Subhashini Ayloo
    Joseph F. Buell
    Georgios Orthopoulos
    Samer Sbayi
    Go Wakabayashi
    Bethany J. Slater
    Aurora Pryor
    D. Rohan Jeyarajah
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 7915 - 7937