Peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery versus open radical hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
作者
Hoegl, Jorge [1 ]
Viveros-Carreno, David [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Palacios, Tatiana [5 ]
Gallego-Ardila, Andres [6 ]
Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro [7 ]
Estrada, Erick Estuardo [8 ]
Noll, Florencia [9 ]
Krause, Kate [10 ]
Baiocchi, Glauco [11 ]
Minig, Lucas [12 ]
Grillo-Ardila, Carlos Fernando [13 ,14 ]
Pareja, Rene [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Este Dr Domingo Luciani, Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Caracas, Venezuela
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Clin Univ Colombia, Gynecol Oncol, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Ctr Tratamiento Invest Canc Luis Carlos Sarmiento, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Hosp Infantil Univ San Jose, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud FUCS, Vicerrectoria Invest, Bogota, Colombia
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX USA
[8] Hosp Gen San Juan Dios, Gynecol & Obstet, Guatemala City, Guatemala
[9] Hosp Sanat Allende, Ginecol Oncol, Cordoba, Argentina
[10] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[11] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Gynecol Oncol, Medellin, Colombia
[12] Valencian Inst Oncol IVO, Gynecol Oncol, Valencia, Spain
[13] Univ Nacl Colombia, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Bogota, Colombia
[14] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Grp Invest Clin & Epidemiol Canc, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
cervical cancer; adenocarcinoma; peritoneum; laparoscopes; laparotomy; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PATTERNS; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2022-003937
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing minimally invasive or open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. MethodsThe MEDLINE (accessed through Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Clinical Trials, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from inception up to April 2022. Articles published in English were considered. The included studies reported on patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA-IIA squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and/or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix who underwent primary surgery. Studies had to report at least one case of peritoneal carcinomatosis as a recurrence pattern, and only studies comparing recurrence after minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery were considered. Variables of interest were manually extracted into a standardized electronic database. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022325068). ResultsThe initial search identified 518 articles. After the removal of the duplicate entries from the initial search, two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the remaining 453 articles. Finally, 78 articles were selected for full-text evaluation; 22 articles (a total of 7626 patients) were included in the analysis-one randomized controlled trial and 21 observational retrospective studies. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 60.9%, and the tumor size was <4 cm in 92.8% of patients. Peritoneal carcinomatosis pattern represented 22.2% of recurrences in the minimally invasive surgery approach versus 8.8% in open surgery, accounting for 15.5% of all recurrences. The meta-analysis of observational studies revealed a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after minimally invasive surgery (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.74, p<0.05). ConclusionMinimally invasive surgery is associated with a statistically significant higher risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1504
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Smith, Anna Jo Bodurtha
    Jones, Tiffany Nicole
    Miao, Diana
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 544 - U60
  • [2] Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Yizi
    Li, Bo
    Ren, Fang
    Song, Zixuan
    Ouyang, Ling
    Liu, Kuiran
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [3] A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter
    Sun, Si
    Cai, Jing
    Li, Ruixie
    Wang, Yujia
    Zhao, Jing
    Huang, Yuhui
    Xu, Linjuan
    Yang, Qiang
    Wang, Zehua
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (03) : 623 - 637
  • [4] Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nitecki, Roni
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Krause, Kate J.
    Tergas, Ana I.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    Melamed, Alexander
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (07) : 1019 - 1027
  • [5] Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size ≤2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Albright, Benjamin B.
    Ko, Emily M.
    Haggerty, Ashley F.
    Giuntoli, Robert L., II
    Kim, Sarah H.
    Morgan, Mark A.
    Latif, Nawar A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 (07) : 983 - 990
  • [6] Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy
    Kampers, J.
    Gerhardt, E.
    Sibbertsen, P.
    Flock, T.
    Hertel, H.
    Klapdor, R.
    Jentschke, M.
    Hillemanns, P.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (02) : 295 - 314
  • [7] Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Yue-Lin
    Li, Rui-Zhe
    Feng, Bo-Jie
    Lu, Yu -Han
    Wang, Li-Fei
    Wang, Zhao-Yun
    Pei, Kai-Ge
    Sun, Li-Fei
    Li, Rui
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (04):
  • [8] Hiatal Hernia After Open versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Oor, J. E.
    Wiezer, M. J.
    Hazebroek, E. J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (08) : 2690 - 2698
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tantitamit, Tanitra
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (04): : 481 - 488
  • [10] Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Extraforaminal Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Akinduro, Oluwaseun O.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Alvi, Mohammed Ali
    Yoon, Jang W.
    Eluchie, Jamachi
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Wang, Zhen
    Chen, Selby G.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 108 : 924 - +