Direct and indirect network effects are equivalent: A comment on "Direct and Indirect Network Effects: Are They Equivalent?"

被引:1
作者
Church, Jeffrey [1 ]
Gandal, Neil [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Econ, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Berglas Sch Econ, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Publ Policy, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Network effects; Network externalities; MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION; STANDARDIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.08.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Clements (2004) makes the following two claims: (i) unlike direct network effects, increases in the size of the market do not, in the case of indirect network effects, make standardization more likely, but (ii) indirect network effects are associated with excessive standardization. We show in Clements' framework that neither of these results are correct: standardization is more likely as the number of software firms increases and when the type of market equilibrium is unique - there are only multiple networks or only standardization - there is never excessive standardization, but there could be insufficient standardization, just as is the case with direct network effects. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 712
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条