Early and late residual renal function and surgical complications in living donors: A 15-year experience at a single institution

被引:12
作者
Sansalone, C. V. [1 ]
Maione, G. [1 ]
Aseni, P. [1 ]
Rossetti, O. [1 ]
Mangoni, I. [1 ]
Soldano, S. [1 ]
De Roberto, A. [1 ]
Minetti, M. E. [1 ]
Perrino, M. L. [1 ]
Civati, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Niguarda Hosp, Kidney Pancreas Transplantat Unit, Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.137
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Living donation in the field of renal transplantation has increased over time as well as the use of laparoscopic nephrectomy. We present a 15-year experience on 162 living donors (105 women, 57 men; mean age, 46.7 years; range, 31-74 years) who underwent nephrectomy using different surgical approaches as open lombotomic nephrectomy (OLN), open transperitoneal nephrectorny (OTN), and laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectorny (LHAN). We collected data on residual donor and recipient renal function, as well as early versus late medical and surgical complications. With a mean follow-up of about 8 years, we observed normal residual renal function in all donors and similar results of early and late graft function independent of the surgical procedure. Long-term incidence of hypertension and noninsulin-dependent diabetes in living donors was similar to the general population. OLN and OTN donors showed higher incidences of early and late complications, readmissions, and reoperations than LHAN donors. Our results confirmed that living donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure without serious side effects in terms of renal function and long-term quality of life. LHAN should be the preferred technique because of a lower incidence of early and late complications.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 995
页数:2
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] THE LIVING DONOR IN KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION
    BAY, WH
    HEBERT, LA
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 106 (05) : 719 - 727
  • [2] Patient survival after renal transplantation: I. The impact of dialysis pre-transplant
    Cosio, FG
    Alamir, A
    Yim, S
    Pesavento, TE
    Falkenhain, ME
    Henry, ML
    Elkhammas, EA
    Davies, EA
    Bumgardner, GL
    Ferguson, RM
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 53 (03) : 767 - 772
  • [3] EDWARDS EB, 1992, CLIN TRANSPL, V61
  • [4] KAHAN BD, 2000, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, pP145
  • [5] Preemptive kidney transplantation: The advantage and the advantaged
    Kasiske, BL
    Snyder, JJ
    Matas, AJ
    Ellison, MD
    Gill, JS
    Kausz, AT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (05): : 1358 - 1364
  • [6] KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION FROM UNRELATED LIVING DONORS - TIME TO RECLAIM A DISCARDED OPPORTUNITY
    LEVEY, AS
    HOU, S
    BUSH, HL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 314 (14) : 914 - 916
  • [7] Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome
    Meier-Kriesche, HU
    Port, FK
    Ojo, AO
    Rudich, SM
    Hanson, JA
    Cibrik, DM
    Leichtman, AB
    Kaplan, B
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (03) : 1311 - 1317
  • [8] Long-term (20-37 years) follow-up of living kidney donors
    Ramcharan, T
    Matas, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (10) : 959 - 964
  • [9] Learning laparoscopic donor nephrectomy safely - A report on 100 cases
    Rawlins, MC
    Hefty, TL
    Brown, SL
    Biehl, TR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (05) : 531 - 534
  • [10] Slakey Douglas P, 2002, Prog Transplant, V12, P206