Exergo-sustainability indicators of a turboprop aircraft for the phases of a flight

被引:86
作者
Aydin, Hakan [1 ]
Turan, Onder [2 ]
Karakoc, T. Hikmet [2 ]
Midilli, Adnan [3 ]
机构
[1] TUSA Engine Ind, Eskisehir, Turkey
[2] Anadolu Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-26470 Eskisehir, Turkey
[3] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Div Energy, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, TR-53100 Rize, Turkey
关键词
Exergy; Sustainability; Energy: aviation; Turboprop; Environment; ENERGY STRATEGIES; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; ENGINE; PARAMETERS; EMISSIONS; HYDROGEN; OPTIMIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; EFFICIENCY; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.076
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
One of the key challenges for sustainable aviation is to reduce global and local environmental impacts. The scope of this study is analysed and discussed in detail for better understanding of sustainability performances of a turboprop aircraft. In this regard, this study presents exergetic sustainability indicators of the turboprop engine for eight flight phases. The results show that exergetic efficiency approaches a maximum value to be 29.2%, waste exergy ratio (to be 70.8%), exergetic destruction ratio (to be 0.41) and environmental effect factor (to be 2.43) become minimum values, whereas exergetic sustainability index approaches a maximum value (to be 0.41). The phases of taxi and landing for the turboprop aircraft have minimum exergy efficiency (to be 20.6%) and minimum exergetic sustainability index (to be 0.26). Accordingly, the exergetic efficiency, waste exergy ratio and exergetic sustainability index of the aircraft are reasonably well in the climb, maximum cruise/continuous, normal/maximum take-off and APR (automatic power reverse) phases. Finally, it is supposed that studying exergetic indicators for an aircraft enables how much improvement is possible for aircraft engines to achieve better sustainable aviation. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 560
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Afgan N. H., 1998, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, V2, P235, DOI 10.1016/S1364-0321(98)00002-1
[2]   Sustainability assessment of a hybrid energy system [J].
Afgan, Nain H. ;
Carvalho, Maria G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (08) :2903-2910
[3]   Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators [J].
Afgan, NH ;
Carvalho, MG ;
Hovanov, NV .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) :603-612
[4]   Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems [J].
Afgan, NH ;
Carvalho, MG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2004, 29 (13) :1327-1342
[5]   Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants [J].
Afgan, NH ;
Carvalho, MG .
ENERGY, 2002, 27 (08) :739-755
[6]   Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (10) :5886-5898
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, EXERGY INT J
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CT7 9C TRAIN MAN POW
[9]   Critical review of exergy-based indicators for the environmental impact of emissions [J].
Ao, Yongan ;
Gunnewiek, Lowy ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2008, 5 (1-2) :87-104
[10]   Component-based exergetic measures of an experimental turboprop/turboshaft engine for propeller aircrafts and helicopters [J].
Aydin, Hakan ;
Turan, Onder ;
Karakoc, T. Hikmet ;
Midilli, Adnan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2012, 11 (03) :322-348