Basis of substrate binding by the chaperonin GroEL

被引:53
作者
Wang, ZL [1 ]
Feng, HP [1 ]
Landry, SJ [1 ]
Maxwell, J [1 ]
Gierasch, LM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Chem, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/bi991070p
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The molecular chaperonins are essential proteins involved in protein folding, complex assembly, and polypeptide translocation. While there is abundant structural information about the machinery and the mechanistic details of its action are well studied, it is yet unresolved how chaperonins recognize a large number of structurally unrelated polypeptides in their unfolded or partially folded forms. To determine the nature of chaperonin-substrate recognition, we have characterized by NMR methods the interactions of GroEL with synthetic peptides that mimic segments of unfolded proteins. In previous work, we found using transferred nuclear Overhauser effect (trNOE) analysis that two 13 amino acid peptides bound GroEL in an amphipathic a-helical conformation. By extending the study to a variety of peptides with differing sequence motifs, we have observed that peptides can adopt conformations other than or-helix when bound to GroEL. Furthermore, peptides of the same composition exhibited significantly different affinities for GroEL as manifested by the magnitude of trNOEs. Binding to GroEL correlates well with the ability of the peptide to cluster hydrophobic residues on one face of the peptide, as determined by the retention time on reversed-phase (RP) HPLC, We conclude that the molecular basis of GroEL-substrate recognition is the presentation of a hydrophobic surface by an incompletely folded polypeptide and that many backbone conformations can be accommodated.
引用
收藏
页码:12537 / 12546
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction [J].
Aoki, K ;
Taguchi, H ;
Shindo, Y ;
Yoshida, M ;
Ogasahara, K ;
Yutani, K ;
Tanaka, N .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 272 (51) :32158-32162
[2]  
Ayling A, 1996, PROTEIN SCI, V5, P478
[3]   AFFINITY PANNING OF A LIBRARY OF PEPTIDES DISPLAYED ON BACTERIOPHAGES REVEALS THE BINDING-SPECIFICITY OF BIP [J].
BLONDELGUINDI, S ;
CWIRLA, SE ;
DOWER, WJ ;
LIPSHUTZ, RJ ;
SPRANG, SR ;
SAMBROOK, JF ;
GETHING, MJH .
CELL, 1993, 75 (04) :717-728
[4]   The 2.4 angstrom crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP gamma S [J].
Boisvert, DC ;
Wang, JM ;
Otwinowski, Z ;
Horwich, AL ;
Sigler, PB .
NATURE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 3 (02) :170-177
[5]   THE CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF THE BACTERIAL CHAPERONIN GROEL AT 2.8-ANGSTROM [J].
BRAIG, K ;
OTWINOWSKI, Z ;
HEGDE, R ;
BOISVERT, DC ;
JOACHIMIAK, A ;
HORWICH, AL ;
SIGLER, PB .
NATURE, 1994, 371 (6498) :578-586
[6]  
Braun S, 2000, 150 and More Basic NMR Experiments: A Practical Course Second Expanded Edition
[7]   Model peptide studies demonstrate that amphipathic secondary structures can be recognized by the chaperonin GroEL (cpn60) [J].
Brazil, BT ;
Cleland, JL ;
McDowell, RS ;
Skelton, NJ ;
Paris, K ;
Horowitz, PM .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 272 (08) :5105-5111
[8]   Substrate shuttling between the DnaK and GroEL systems indicates a chaperone network promoting protein folding [J].
Buchberger, A ;
Schroder, H ;
Hesterkamp, T ;
Schonfeld, HJ ;
Bukau, B .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 261 (03) :328-333
[9]   GROE FACILITATES REFOLDING OF CITRATE SYNTHASE BY SUPPRESSING AGGREGATION [J].
BUCHNER, J ;
SCHMIDT, M ;
FUCHS, M ;
JAENICKE, R ;
RUDOLPH, R ;
SCHMID, FX ;
KIEFHABER, T .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1991, 30 (06) :1586-1591
[10]   THE ORIGINS AND CONSEQUENCES OF ASYMMETRY IN THE CHAPERONIN REACTION CYCLE [J].
BURSTON, SG ;
RANSON, NA ;
CLARKE, AR .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 249 (01) :138-152