Creation of Web 2.0 tools ontology to improve learning

被引:32
作者
Kurilovas, Eugenijus [1 ,2 ]
Juskeviciene, Anita [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius State Univ, Inst Math & Informat, LT-08663 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Ontology; Web; 2.0; Collaborative learning; Semantic search; Learning styles; Learning activities;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.026
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of the paper is to present systematic review results on ontology development tools, to establish interconnections between learning styles, preferred learning activities and related Web 2.0 tools, and also to create Web 2.0 tools ontology to interconnect learning activities with relevant Web 2.0 tools. This ontology is necessary for learners to semantically search for suitable Web 2.0 tools while learning in virtual learning environments (VLEs). Suitability of Web 2.0 tools depends on preferred types of learning activities which in its turn depend on preferred learning styles. The research results include: (1) systematic review results on ontology development tools and ontology representation language/formats; (2) established interconnections between learning styles, preferred learning activities, and relevant Web 2.0 tools using sets portrait method, and (3) creating Web 2.0 tools ontology to interconnect preferred learning activities with relevant Web 2.0 tools in VLE. The research results will be implemented in iTEC - pan-European research and development project focused on the design of the future classroom funded by EU 7FP. The research results presented are absolutely novel in scientific literature, and this makes the current study distinct from all other works in the area. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1386
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Collaborative Learning Concept Implementation through Web. 2.0 Tools: The Case of Industrial Engineering Fundamentals' Discipline [J].
Telles Do Carmo, Breno Barros ;
Jaguaribe Pontes, Renata Lopes .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2013, 29 (01) :205-214
[32]   Towards an Ontology of Computational Technologies as Tools for Aesthetic Creation [J].
Hernandez-Ramirez, Rodrigo .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE ARTS, 2015, 7 (01) :7-15
[33]   Mining the web for learning the ontology [J].
Aoun, Bassam M. ;
Khair, Marie .
ICSOFT 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND DATA TECHNOLOGIES, VOL ISDM/WSEHST/DC, 2007, :189-192
[34]   WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN TEACHER TRAINING DEGREES [J].
Ipina, N. ;
Brazo, L. ;
Zuberogoitia, A. ;
Goni, M. ;
Pavon, A. .
EDULEARN11: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, :3709-3715
[35]   MODERN WEB 2.0 TOOLS FOR EDUCATIONAL ASTRONOMY [J].
Ricci, Davide ;
Nicastro, Luciano ;
Angel Pio, Miguel .
7TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2013), 2013, :2998-3007
[36]   Web 2.0: Easy Tools for Busy Clinicians [J].
Phillippi, Julia C. ;
Buxton, Margaret .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2010, 55 (05) :472-476
[37]   Adoption of Web 2.0 tools in distance education [J].
Usluel, Yasemin Kocak ;
Mazman, Sacide Guezin .
WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES - NEW TRENDS AND ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, 1 (01) :818-823
[38]   NeoGeography and Web 2.0: concepts, tools and applications [J].
Hudson-Smith, Andrew ;
Crooks, Andrew ;
Gibin, Maurizio ;
Milton, Richard ;
Batty, Michael .
JOURNAL OF LOCATION BASED SERVICES, 2009, 3 (02) :118-145
[39]   A comparison of Web 2.0 tools in a doctoral course [J].
Meyer, Katrina A. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (04) :226-232
[40]   Students' conceptions and experiences of Web 2.0 tools [J].
Virkus, Sirje ;
Bamigbola, Alice A. .
NEW LIBRARY WORLD, 2011, 112 (11-12) :479-489