Creation of Web 2.0 tools ontology to improve learning

被引:32
作者
Kurilovas, Eugenijus [1 ,2 ]
Juskeviciene, Anita [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius State Univ, Inst Math & Informat, LT-08663 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Ontology; Web; 2.0; Collaborative learning; Semantic search; Learning styles; Learning activities;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.026
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of the paper is to present systematic review results on ontology development tools, to establish interconnections between learning styles, preferred learning activities and related Web 2.0 tools, and also to create Web 2.0 tools ontology to interconnect learning activities with relevant Web 2.0 tools. This ontology is necessary for learners to semantically search for suitable Web 2.0 tools while learning in virtual learning environments (VLEs). Suitability of Web 2.0 tools depends on preferred types of learning activities which in its turn depend on preferred learning styles. The research results include: (1) systematic review results on ontology development tools and ontology representation language/formats; (2) established interconnections between learning styles, preferred learning activities, and relevant Web 2.0 tools using sets portrait method, and (3) creating Web 2.0 tools ontology to interconnect preferred learning activities with relevant Web 2.0 tools in VLE. The research results will be implemented in iTEC - pan-European research and development project focused on the design of the future classroom funded by EU 7FP. The research results presented are absolutely novel in scientific literature, and this makes the current study distinct from all other works in the area. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1386
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THEMES SCI TECHNOLOG
[2]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATION QUALITY L
[3]  
Béres I, 2012, INFORM EDUC, V11, P1
[4]   The Semantic Web - A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities [J].
Berners-Lee, T ;
Hendler, J ;
Lassila, O .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2001, 284 (05) :34-+
[5]  
Biolchini J., 67905 RTES
[6]   Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies.: Where is their meeting point? [J].
Corcho, O ;
Fernández-López, M ;
Gómez-Pérez, A .
DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2003, 46 (01) :41-64
[7]  
Dorça FA, 2012, INFORM EDUC, V11, P191
[8]   WonderTools? A comparative study of ontological engineering tools [J].
Duineveld, AJ ;
Stoter, R ;
Weiden, MR ;
Kenepa, B ;
Benjamins, VR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2000, 52 (06) :1111-1133
[9]  
Fleming N. D., 2001, Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies, IGI Global
[10]   A TRANSLATION APPROACH TO PORTABLE ONTOLOGY SPECIFICATIONS [J].
GRUBER, TR .
KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, 1993, 5 (02) :199-220