Mobility Based Multicast Routing in Wireless Mesh Networks

被引:0
作者
Jain, Sanjeev [1 ]
Tripathi, Vijay Shanker [2 ]
Tiwari, Sudarshan [3 ]
机构
[1] Govt Engn Coll Bikaner, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Bikaner, India
[2] Motilal Nehru Natl Inst Technol, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION AND ELECTRONICS SYSTEM DESIGN | 2013年 / 8760卷
关键词
WMNs; ODMRP; DVMRP;
D O I
10.1117/12.2010116
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
There exist two fundamental approaches to multicast routing namely minimum cost trees and shortest path trees. The minimum cost tree is one which connects receiver and sources by providing a minimum number of transmissions (MNTs) the MNTs approach is generally used for energy constraint sensor and mobile ad hoc networks. In this paper we have considered node mobility and try to find out simulation based comparison of the shortest path tree, minimum steiner trees and minimum number of transmission trees in wireless mesh networks by using the performance metrics like as an end to end delay, average jitter, throughput and packet delivery ratio, average unicast packet delivery ratio, etc. We have also evaluated multicast performance in the small and large wireless mesh networks. In case of multicast performance in the small networks we have found that when the traffic load is moderate or high the SPTs outperform the MSTs and MNTs in all cases. The SPTs have lowest end to end delay and average jitter in almost all cases. In case of multicast performance in the large network we have seen that the MSTs provide minimum total edge cost and minimum number of transmissions. We have also found that the one drawback of SPTs, when the group size is large and rate of multicast sending is high SPTs causes more packet losses to other flows as MCTs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Wireless mesh networks: a survey [J].
Akyildiz, IF ;
Wang, XD ;
Wang, WL .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2005, 47 (04) :445-487
[2]  
BALLARDIE T, 1995, ACM SIGCOMM, P85
[3]  
Deering S., 1988, 1054 RFC STANF U
[4]  
DEERING S, 1996, IEEE ACM T NETWORKIN, V4
[5]  
Galera, 2006, 1 INT C INT INT AD H
[6]   A multicast routing protocol for ad-hoc networks [J].
Garcia-Luna-Aceves, JJ ;
Madruga, EL .
IEEE INFOCOM '99 - THE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS: THE FUTURE IS NOW, 1999, :784-792
[7]   Multicast Routing for Multimedia Communication [J].
Kompella, Vachaspathi P. ;
Pasquale, Joseph C. ;
Polyzos, George C. .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 1993, 1 (03) :286-292
[8]  
Paul S., 1998, 1584 IETF RFC
[9]   Approximating optimal multicast trees in wireless multihop networks [J].
Ruiz, PM ;
Gomez-Skarmeta, AF .
10TH IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, :686-691
[10]  
Waitzman D., 1988, IETF RFC 1075