Dual-Energy CT in the Follow-Up after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:4
|
作者
Braegelmann, A. [1 ]
Bunck, A. [1 ,2 ]
Donas, K. [3 ]
Kasprzak, B. [3 ]
Maintz, D. [1 ,2 ]
Heindel, W. [1 ]
Seifarth, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Koln, Inst & Poliklin Radiol Diagnost, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Munster, Klin Vaskulare & Endovaskulare Chirurg, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2013年 / 185卷 / 04期
关键词
aorta; CT angiography; aneurysm; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOLEAK DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY; EVAR;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1330447
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study investigates the dual-energy procedure for postoperative CT follow-up scans after endovascularly treated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The procedure is analyzed with respect to its sensitivity and specificity as well as the associated radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: 51 examinations were carried out on 47 patients between February 2009 and March 2010. For each patient, a non-enhanced, an arterial and a venous scan were conducted, the latter two using the dual-energy technology. Virtual images for the non-enhanced phase were reconstructed from the data taken in the venous phase. Protocol A, the reference standard, consisted of non-enhanced images and images of the arterial and venous phase. In protocol B, standard non-enhanced images were replaced by the reconstructed virtual non-enhanced images. Protocol C consisted only of virtual non-enhanced and 80 kV images taken during the venous phase. All data was anonymized and evaluated by two independent radiologists. For protocol C, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were computed. The effective radiation dosage was determined for each scan. Results: All endoleaks identified in protocol A were found using protocols B and C. For protocol C, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were 100%, the specificity was 94.1%, and the positive predictive value was 89.5%. Compared to protocol A, protocol C reduces the radiation exposure by 62.45%. Conclusion: A scan protocol consisting of virtual non-enhanced images as well as 80 kV images taken during the venous phase was found to be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing endoleaks, while reducing the radiation exposure by 62.45%.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 357
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    McWilliams, RG
    Martin, J
    White, D
    Gould, DA
    Harris, PL
    Fear, SC
    Brennan, J
    Gilling-Smith, GL
    Bakran, A
    Rowlands, PC
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (08) : 1107 - 1114
  • [32] Clinical Implications of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Follow-Up After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Bobadilla, Joseph Louis
    Suwanabol, Pasithorn A.
    Reeder, Scott B.
    Pozniak, Myron A.
    Bley, Thorsten A.
    Tefera, Girma
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 27 (08) : 1042 - 1048
  • [33] Dual energy CT angiography: pros and cons of dual-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm in patients after endovascular aortic repair
    Boos, Johannes
    Fang, Jieming
    Heidinger, Benedikt H.
    Raptopoulos, Vassilios
    Brook, Olga R.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (03) : 749 - 758
  • [34] Utility of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Aneurysm Follow-Up and Detection of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Kawada, Hiroshi
    Goshima, Satoshi
    Sakurai, Kota
    Noda, Yoshifumi
    Kajita, Kimihiro
    Tanahashi, Yukichi
    Kawai, Nobuyuki
    Ishida, Narihiro
    Shimabukuro, Katsuya
    Doi, Kiyoshi
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (04) : 513 - 524
  • [35] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus color duplex ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Iezzi, Roberto
    Basilico, Raffaella
    Giancristofaro, Daniela
    Pascali, Danilo
    Cotroneo, Antonio Raffaele
    Storto, Maria Luigia
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 49 (03) : 552 - 560
  • [36] Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Sawhney, R
    Kerlan, RK
    Wall, SD
    Chuter, TAM
    Ruiz, DE
    Canto, CJ
    LaBerge, JM
    Reilly, LM
    Yee, J
    Wilson, MW
    Jean-Claude, J
    Faruqi, RM
    Gordon, RL
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) : 157 - 160
  • [37] Transcatheter, endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Feasibility, noninvasive diagnosis, problems, and follow-up
    Kronzon, I
    Varkey, M
    Tunick, PA
    Riles, T
    Rosen, R
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 1999, 16 (06): : 617 - 623
  • [38] Factors Influencing Compliance to Follow-Up After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Oezdemir-van Brunschot, Denise
    Zerellari, Romina
    Tevs, Maria
    Holzhey, David
    Botsios, Spiridon
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 57 (08) : 878 - 883
  • [39] Review of Clinical Applications of Dual-Energy CT in Patients after Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Kazimierczak, Wojciech
    Kazimierczak, Natalia
    Serafin, Zbigniew
    Teraa, Martin
    Hazenberg, Constantijn E. V. B.
    Zimmermann, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (24)
  • [40] Surveillance After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Tse, Donald M. L.
    Tapping, Charles R.
    Patel, Rafiuddin
    Morgan, Robert
    Bratby, Mark J.
    Anthony, Susan
    Uberoi, Raman
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (04) : 875 - 888