Dual-Energy CT in the Follow-Up after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:4
|
作者
Braegelmann, A. [1 ]
Bunck, A. [1 ,2 ]
Donas, K. [3 ]
Kasprzak, B. [3 ]
Maintz, D. [1 ,2 ]
Heindel, W. [1 ]
Seifarth, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Koln, Inst & Poliklin Radiol Diagnost, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Munster, Klin Vaskulare & Endovaskulare Chirurg, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2013年 / 185卷 / 04期
关键词
aorta; CT angiography; aneurysm; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOLEAK DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY; EVAR;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1330447
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study investigates the dual-energy procedure for postoperative CT follow-up scans after endovascularly treated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The procedure is analyzed with respect to its sensitivity and specificity as well as the associated radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: 51 examinations were carried out on 47 patients between February 2009 and March 2010. For each patient, a non-enhanced, an arterial and a venous scan were conducted, the latter two using the dual-energy technology. Virtual images for the non-enhanced phase were reconstructed from the data taken in the venous phase. Protocol A, the reference standard, consisted of non-enhanced images and images of the arterial and venous phase. In protocol B, standard non-enhanced images were replaced by the reconstructed virtual non-enhanced images. Protocol C consisted only of virtual non-enhanced and 80 kV images taken during the venous phase. All data was anonymized and evaluated by two independent radiologists. For protocol C, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were computed. The effective radiation dosage was determined for each scan. Results: All endoleaks identified in protocol A were found using protocols B and C. For protocol C, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were 100%, the specificity was 94.1%, and the positive predictive value was 89.5%. Compared to protocol A, protocol C reduces the radiation exposure by 62.45%. Conclusion: A scan protocol consisting of virtual non-enhanced images as well as 80 kV images taken during the venous phase was found to be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing endoleaks, while reducing the radiation exposure by 62.45%.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 357
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Imaging after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Golzarian, J
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 28 (02): : 236 - 243
  • [22] Secondary Interventions and Long-term Follow-up after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Geraedts, Anna C. M.
    Mulay, Sana
    Vahl, Anco
    Wisselink, Willem
    Koelemay, Mark J. W.
    Balm, Ron
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 71 : 381 - 391
  • [23] Role of low dose CT angiography in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aorta
    Macchi, Monica
    Floridi, Chiara
    Strocchi, Sabina
    Fontana, Federico
    Mangini, Monica
    Piacentino, Filippo
    Duka, Ejona
    Donati, Alberto V.
    Fugazzola, Carlo
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (12) : 1471 - 1478
  • [24] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with the ancure endograft: CT follow-up of perigraft flow and aneurysm size at 6 months
    Franco, TJ
    Zajko, AB
    Federle, MP
    Makaroun, MS
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (04) : 429 - 435
  • [25] Effect of endoleaks on changes in aortoiliac volume after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Meinel, Felix G.
    Haack, Mareike
    Weidenhagen, Rolf
    Hellbach, Katharina
    Rottenkolber, Marietta
    Armbruster, Marco
    Jerkku, Thomas
    Thierfelder, Kolja M.
    Pluma, Jessica L. V.
    Koeppelb, Thomas A.
    Rubind, Geoffrey D.
    Sommera, Wieland H.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2016, 64 (02) : 135 - 147
  • [26] Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of CEUS
    Iezzi, R.
    Cotroneo, A. R.
    Basilico, R.
    Simeone, A.
    Storto, M. L.
    Bonomo, L.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (01): : 106 - 114
  • [27] Maximum Diameter Measurements of Aortic Aneurysms on Axial CT Images After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Sufficient for Follow-up?
    Baumueller, Stephan
    Thi Dan Linh Nguyen
    Goetti, Robert Paul
    Lachat, Mario
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Pfammatter, Thomas
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (06) : 1182 - 1189
  • [28] Ultrasound Imaging of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Diagnosis of Aneurysms and Complications and Follow-Up after Endovascular Repair
    Schuster, H.
    Duenser, E.
    Osinger, K.
    Bergmayr, W.
    Fischer-Scholz, U.
    Richter, W.
    Mostbeck, G. H.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2009, 30 (06): : 528 - 543
  • [29] Endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Improved detection with noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT
    Martin, Simon S.
    Wichmann, Julian L.
    Weyer, Hendrik
    Scholtz, Jan-Erik
    Leithner, Doris
    Spandorfer, Adam
    Bodelle, Boris
    Jacobi, Volkmar
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Albrecht, Moritz H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 94 : 125 - 132
  • [30] Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: long-term follow-up of endovascular versus open repair
    Piffaretti, Gabriele
    Mariscalco, Giovanni
    Riva, Francesca
    Fontana, Federico
    Carrafiello, Gianpaolo
    Castelli, Patrizio
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 10 (02) : 273 - 282