Use of design of experiments and Monte Carlo method for instruments optimal design

被引:17
作者
Moschioni, G. [1 ]
Saggin, B. [1 ]
Tarabini, M. [1 ]
Hald, J. [2 ]
Morkholt, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Meccan, I-23900 Lecce, Italy
[2] Bruel & Kjaer Sound & Vibrat Measurement, DK-2850 Naerum, Denmark
关键词
Sound Intensity; Acoustics; Uncertainty; Design of experiments; GUM; Monte Carlo; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2012.10.024
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A common issue in the design of measurement instruments is the comparison between different solutions in terms of components of the measurement chain, data processing or even measurement principles; the predicted instrumental uncertainty is the driving parameter for such a comparison. While in many situations the linearization of the measuring model allows using the standard ISO GUM procedure, in complex cases it might be necessary to proceed with Monte Carlo simulations as per ISO GUM supplement 1. This paper describes a method that combines the factorial design of experiments (DOE) and the ISO GUM supplement 1 uncertainty evaluation method to guide the instrument designer in the instrument configuration optimization. The proposed approach allows estimating, in the design phase, the overall instrumental uncertainty for different configurations, the instrument sensitivity to the accuracy in the measurements of its inputs and the effects on systematic and random measurement errors deriving from the choice of all instrumental variables. The use of data populations selected with the DOE criteria allows recovering valuable parameters equivalent to the sensitivity factors of the GUM linearized approach. The data analysis allows separating the critical factors that must be accurately controlled from those only weakly affecting the measurement uncertainty. The method has been applied to a case study where the metrological performances of a system devoted to the measurement of the acoustic radiation emitted by a vibrating panel in a reverberant enclosure had to be assessed. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:976 / 984
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty [J].
Cox, Maurice G. ;
Siebert, Bernd R. L. .
METROLOGIA, 2006, 43 (04) :S178-S188
[12]  
Doebelin E.O., 2004, MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS, V5th
[13]   Design and analysis of experiments in CMM measurement uncertainty study [J].
Feng, Chang-Xue Jack ;
Saal, Anthony L. ;
Salsbury, James G. ;
Ness, Arnold R. ;
Lin, Gary C. S. .
PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 31 (02) :94-101
[14]   Auto-evaluation of the uncertainty in virtual instruments [J].
Ghiani, E ;
Locci, N ;
Muscas, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2004, 53 (03) :672-677
[15]   Basic theory and properties of statistically optimized near-field acoustical holography [J].
Hald, Jorgen .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (04) :2105-2120
[16]  
JCGM, 2008, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement: GUM 1995 with minor corrections-evaluation of measurement data
[17]  
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM), 2008, INT VOCABULARY METRO, V200
[18]  
Montgomery D.C., 2009, Engineering statistics
[19]   Approaches to evaluate the virtual instrumentation measurement uncertainties [J].
Nuccio, S ;
Spataro, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2002, 51 (06) :1347-1352
[20]   Calibration of passive microwave polarimeters that use hybrid coupler-based correlators [J].
Piepmeier, JR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 42 (02) :391-400