Developing a patient and family-centred approach for measuring the quality of injury care: a study protocol

被引:15
作者
Stelfox, Henry T. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
Boyd, Jamie M. [3 ]
Straus, Sharon E. [5 ]
Gagliardi, Anna R. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Crit Care Med, Calgary Zone, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary Zone, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Inst Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[6] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Injury; Patient-centred care; Quality improvement; Quality indicators; Trauma; Focus group; Consensus panel; Survey; PREVENTABLE DEATH; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; AUDIT FILTERS; SAMPLE-SIZE; TRAUMA CARE; HEALTH-CARE; OF-CARE; INDICATORS; SYSTEMS; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-13-31
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Quality indicators (QI) are used in health care to measure quality of service and performance improvement. Health care professionals and organizations caring for patients with injuries need information regarding the quality of care provided and the outcomes experienced in order to target improvement efforts. However, very little is known about the quality of injury care provided to individual patients and populations and even less about patients' perspectives on quality of care. The absence of QIs that incorporate patient or family preferences, needs or values has been identified as an important gap in the science and practice of injury quality improvement. The primary objective of this research protocol is to develop and evaluate the first set of patient and family-centred QIs of injury care for critically injured patients Methods/design: This mixed methods study is comprised of three Sub-Studies. Sub-Study A will utilize focus group methodology to describe the preferences, needs and values of critically injured patients and their family members regarding the quality of health care delivered. Qualitative content analysis of the transcripts will begin after the first completed focus group and will draw on grounded theory using a process of open, axial and selective coding. A panel of stakeholders will be assembled during Sub-Study B to review the themes identified from the focus groups and develop a catalogue of potential patient and family-centred QIs of injury care using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM). The QIs developed by the stakeholder panel will be pilot tested in Sub-Study C using surveys of patients and their family members to determine construct validity, intra-rater reliability and clinical sensibility. Discussion: Measuring the quality of injury care is but a first step towards improving patient outcomes. This research will develop the first set of patient and family-centred QIs of injury care. To improve patient care, we need accessible, reliable indicators of quality that are important to patients, and that can then be used to establish quality of care benchmarks, to flag potential problems or successes, follow trends over time and identify disparities across organizations, communities, populations and regions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [11] Health care quality - Incorporating consumer perspectives
    Cleary, PD
    EdgmanLevitan, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (19): : 1608 - 1612
  • [12] AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF SURGEONS AUDIT FILTERS - ASSOCIATIONS WITH PATIENT OUTCOME AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION
    COPES, WS
    STAZ, CF
    KONVOLINKA, CW
    SACCO, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1995, 38 (03) : 432 - 438
  • [13] Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS™) -: Foreword
    Crofton, C
    Lubalin, JS
    Darby, C
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1999, 37 (03) : MS1 - MS9
  • [14] Continuous use of standard process audit filters has limited value in an established trauma system
    Cryer, HG
    Hiatt, JR
    Fleming, AW
    Gruen, JP
    Sterling, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 41 (03) : 389 - 394
  • [15] Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS® survey to support improvements in patient-centred care:: lessons from a quality improvement collaborative
    Davies, Elizabeth
    Shaller, Dale
    Edgman-Levitan, Susan
    Safran, Dana G.
    Oftedahl, Gary
    Sakowski, John
    Cleary, Paul D.
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2008, 11 (02) : 160 - 176
  • [16] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CRITICAL CARE ERRORS IN CAUSING PREVENTABLE DEATH IN TRAUMA PATIENTS IN A TRAUMA SYSTEM
    DAVIS, JW
    HOYT, DB
    MCARDLE, MS
    MACKERSIE, RC
    SHACKFORD, SR
    EASTMAN, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1991, 31 (06) : 813 - 819
  • [18] Donabedian A., 1980, Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Volume 1. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, V1
  • [19] Respecting the subjective: quality measurement from the patient's perspective
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Buetow, Stephen
    Hibbard, Judith
    Wensing, Michel
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7628): : 1021 - 1022
  • [20] Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment
    Etchells, E
    Darzins, P
    Silberfeld, M
    Singer, PA
    McKenny, J
    Naglie, G
    Katz, M
    Guyatt, GH
    Molloy, DW
    Strang, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (01) : 27 - 34