Efficacy and Safety of Alfuzosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:17
作者
Liu, Chenli [1 ]
Zeng, Guohua [1 ]
Kang, Ran [1 ]
Wu, Wenqi [1 ]
Li, Jiasheng [1 ]
Chen, Kang [1 ]
Wan, Show P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangdong Key Lab Urol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol,Minimally Invas Surg Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TAMSULOSIN; FACILITATE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0134589
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Alfuzosin has been widely used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis, and is claimed to be a selective agent for the lower urinary tract with low incidence of adverse side-effects and hypotensive changes. Recently, several randomized controlled trials have reported using Alfuzosin as an expulsive therapy of ureteral stones. Tamsulosin, another alpha blocker, has also been used as an agent for the expulsive therapy for ureteral stones. It is unclear whether alfuzosin has similar efficacy as Tamsulosin in the management of ureteral stones. Objective To perform a systematic review and analysis of literatures comparing Alfuzosin with Tamsulosin or standard conservative therapy for the treatment of ureteral stones less than 10 mm in diameter. Methods A systematic literature review was performed in December 2014 using Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases to identify relevant studies. All randomized and controlled trials were included. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing Alfuzosin with control therapy on the management of distal ureteral stones. Results Alfuzosin provided a significantly higher stone-free rate than the control treatments (RR: 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-2.55; p<0.001), and a shorter stone expulsion time (Weighted mean difference [WMD]: -4.20 d, 95% CI, -6.19 to -2.21; p<0.001), but it has a higher complication rate (RR: 2.02; 95% CI, 1.30-3.15; p<0.01). When Alfuzosin was compared to Tamsulosin, there was no significant difference in terms of stone-free rate (RR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79-1.02; p = 0.09) as well as the stone expulsion time (WMD: 0.52 d, 95% CI, -1.61 to 2.64; p = 0.63). The adverse effects of Alfuzosin were similar to those of Tamsulosin (RR: 0.88; 95% CI, 0.61-1.26; p = 0.47). Conclusions Alfuzosin is a safe and effective agent for the expulsive therapy of ureteral stones smaller than 10 mm in size. It is more effective than therapeutic regiment without alpha blocker. It is equivalent to Tamsulosin in its effectiveness and safety profile. Adverse effects should always be kept in mind when use this class of drugs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Efficacy of Alfuzosin and Tamsulosin in Management of Lower Ureteral Stones [J].
Agrawal, Madhusudan ;
Gupta, Manoj ;
Gupta, Apurva ;
Agrawal, Akash ;
Sarkari, Avijit ;
Lavania, Prashant .
UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (04) :706-709
[2]   Tamsulosin versus Alfuzosin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal Ureteral Stones: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study [J].
Ahmed, Abul-fotouh Abdel-maguid ;
Al-sayed, Abul-yazid Saad .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (03) :193-197
[3]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[4]   Comparison and Efficacy of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Tamsulosin and Alfuzosin in Medical Expulsive Therapy for Lower Ureteral Calculi: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study [J].
Cha, Woo Heon ;
Choi, Jae Duck ;
Kim, Ki Ho ;
Seo, Young Jin ;
Lee, Kyungseop .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 53 (05) :349-354
[5]   Medical expulsive therapy using alfuzosin for patient presenting with ureteral stone less than 10 mm: A prospective randomized controlled trial [J].
Chau, Lysander Hin ;
Tai, Dominic Chi Kin ;
Fung, Berry Tat Chow ;
Li, James Cheuk Man ;
Fan, Chi Wai ;
Li, Michael Ka Wah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 18 (07) :510-514
[6]   Assessing the quality of randomized trials:: Reliability of the Jadad scale [J].
Clark, HD ;
Wells, GA ;
Huët, C ;
McAlister, FA ;
Salmi, LR ;
Fergusson, D ;
Laupacis, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 20 (05) :448-452
[7]   PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
EASTERBROOK, PJ ;
BERLIN, JA ;
GOPALAN, R ;
MATTHEWS, DR .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) :867-872
[8]   Can tamsulosin facilitate expulsion of ureteral stones? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Fan, Bo ;
Yang, Deyong ;
Wang, Jianbo ;
Che, Xiangyu ;
Li, Xiancheng ;
Wang, Lina ;
Chen, Feng ;
Wang, Tiezheng ;
Song, Xishuang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (08) :818-830
[9]  
Morúa AG, 2009, ACTAS UROL ESP, V33, P1005
[10]   Efficacy of Three Different Alpha 1-Adrenergic Blockers and Hyoscine N-Butylbromide for Distal Ureteral Stones [J].
Gurbuz, M. Cenk ;
Polat, Haci ;
Canat, Lutfi ;
Kilic, Mert ;
Caskurlu, Turhan .
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2011, 37 (02) :195-200