Direct Sensitivity Analysis of Multibody Systems: A Vehicle Dynamics Benchmark

被引:16
作者
Callejo, Alfonso [1 ]
Dopico, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Aerosp Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ A Coruna, Lab Ingn Mecan, Mendizabal S-N, Ferrol 15403, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS | 2019年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
DIFFERENTIAL-ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS; AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION; SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; SOFTWARE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1115/1.4041960
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Algorithms for the sensitivity analysis of multibody systems are quickly maturing as computational and software resources grow. Indeed, the area has made substantial progress since the first academic methods and examples were developed. Today, sensitivity analysis tools aimed at gradient-based design optimization are required to be as computationally efficient and scalable as possible. This paper presents extensive verification of one of the most popular sensitivity analysis techniques, namely the direct differentiation method (DDM). Usage of such method is recommended when the number of design parameters relative to the number of outputs is small and when the time integration algorithm is sensitive to accumulation errors. Verification is hereby accomplished through two radically different computational techniques, namely manual differentiation and automatic differentiation, which are used to compute the necessary partial derivatives. Experiments are conducted on an 18-degree-of-freedom, 366-dependent-coordinate bus model with realistic geometry and tire contact forces, which constitutes an unusually large system within general-purpose sensitivity analysis of multibody systems. The results are in good agreement; the manual technique provides shorter runtimes, whereas the automatic differentiation technique is easier to implement. The presented results highlight the potential of manual and automatic differentiation approaches within general-purpose simulation packages, and the importance of formulation benchmarking.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   The complex-step derivative approximation [J].
Martins, JRRA ;
Sturdza, P ;
Alonso, JJ .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 2003, 29 (03) :245-262
[32]   Sensitivity analysis of flexible multibody systems using composite materials components [J].
Neto, Maria Aligusta ;
Ambrosio, Jorge A. C. ;
Leal, Rogerio Pereira .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 77 (03) :386-413
[33]  
Newman JC, 1998, MSSUEIRSERC9808
[34]   STUDY OF INACCURACY IN SEMIANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS - A MODEL PROBLEM [J].
OLHOFF, N ;
RASMUSSEN, J .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1991, 3 (04) :203-213
[35]  
Saltelli A, 2000, SENSITIVITY ANAL
[36]  
Serban R, 1996, 96DETCDAC1087 ASME
[37]  
Zhu Y., 2015, J COMPUT NONLIN DYN, V10, P1