Direct Sensitivity Analysis of Multibody Systems: A Vehicle Dynamics Benchmark

被引:16
作者
Callejo, Alfonso [1 ]
Dopico, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Aerosp Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ A Coruna, Lab Ingn Mecan, Mendizabal S-N, Ferrol 15403, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS | 2019年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
DIFFERENTIAL-ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS; AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION; SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; SOFTWARE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1115/1.4041960
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Algorithms for the sensitivity analysis of multibody systems are quickly maturing as computational and software resources grow. Indeed, the area has made substantial progress since the first academic methods and examples were developed. Today, sensitivity analysis tools aimed at gradient-based design optimization are required to be as computationally efficient and scalable as possible. This paper presents extensive verification of one of the most popular sensitivity analysis techniques, namely the direct differentiation method (DDM). Usage of such method is recommended when the number of design parameters relative to the number of outputs is small and when the time integration algorithm is sensitive to accumulation errors. Verification is hereby accomplished through two radically different computational techniques, namely manual differentiation and automatic differentiation, which are used to compute the necessary partial derivatives. Experiments are conducted on an 18-degree-of-freedom, 366-dependent-coordinate bus model with realistic geometry and tire contact forces, which constitutes an unusually large system within general-purpose sensitivity analysis of multibody systems. The results are in good agreement; the manual technique provides shorter runtimes, whereas the automatic differentiation technique is easier to implement. The presented results highlight the potential of manual and automatic differentiation approaches within general-purpose simulation packages, and the importance of formulation benchmarking.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF THE SEMIANALYTICAL METHOD FOR SHAPE SENSITIVITY CALCULATION
    BARTHELEMY, B
    HAFTKA, RT
    [J]. MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES AND MACHINES, 1990, 18 (03): : 407 - 432
  • [2] ANALYZING AND OPTIMIZING MULTIBODY SYSTEMS
    BESTLE, D
    EBERHARD, P
    [J]. MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES AND MACHINES, 1992, 20 (01): : 67 - 92
  • [3] BESTLE D, 1992, ARCH APPL MECH, V62, P181
  • [4] Bischof CH, 1996, SOLID MECH APPL, V43, P41
  • [5] A hybrid direct-automatic differentiation method for the computation of independent sensitivities in multibody systems
    Callejo, A.
    Garcia de Jalon, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 100 (12) : 933 - 952
  • [6] Callejo A., 2013, THESIS
  • [7] Sensitivity-Based, Multi-Objective Design of Vehicle Suspension Systems
    Callejo, Alfonso
    Garcia de Jalon, Javier
    Luque, Pablo
    Mantaras, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [8] Vehicle Suspension Identification Via Algorithmic Computation of State and Design Sensitivities
    Callejo, Alfonso
    Garcia de Jalon, Javier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2015, 137 (02)
  • [9] Performance of automatic differentiation tools in the dynamic simulation of multibody systems
    Callejo, Alfonso
    Narayanan, Sri Hari Krishna
    Garcia de Jalon, Javier
    Norris, Boyana
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2014, 73 : 35 - 44
  • [10] Adjoint sensitivity analysis for differential-algebraic equations: algorithms and software
    Cao, Y
    Li, ST
    Petzold, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2002, 149 (01) : 171 - 191