Human freedom, Christian righteousness. Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of Rotterdam

被引：0

作者：

Cameron, E ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England

来源：

JOURNAL OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY | 2001年 / 52卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

K [历史、地理];

学科分类号：

06 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：743 / 745

页数：3

相关论文

共 16 条

[1] Human freedom, Christian righteousness. Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of Rotterdam
Cao, GM
STUDI MEDIEVALI, 2001, 42 (01): : 281 - 288
[2] Human freedom, christian righteousness. Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of rotterdam
Hazlett, WIP
EXPOSITORY TIMES, 1999, 110 (11) : 371 - 371
[3] Human freedom, Christian righteousness. Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of Rotterdam
Brooks, PN
JOURNAL OF THEOLOGICAL STUDIES, 1999, 50 : 385 - 386
[4] Human freedom, Christian righteousness: Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of Rotterdam
Rosin, R
RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 55 (03) : 1086 - 1087
[5] Human freedom, Christian righteousness: Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of Rotterdam
Kusukawa, S
RELIGIOUS STUDIES, 1999, 35 (04) : 502 - 504
[6] Human freedom, Christian righteousness: Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of Rotterdam
Schneider, JR
JOURNAL OF RELIGION, 2003, 83 (02) : 271 - 272
[7] Human freedom, Christian righteousness: Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of Rotterdam
Rummel, E
CHURCH HISTORY, 1999, 68 (01): : 176 - 177
[8] Human freedom, Christian righteousness: Philip Melanchthon's exegetical dispute with Erasmus of Rotterdam
Green, LC
SIXTEENTH CENTURY JOURNAL, 1999, 30 (02) : 599 - 601
[9] The Order of Affects: Piety as the Educative Ideal by Erasmus von Rotterdam and Philip Melanchthon
Gross, Eduardo
HORIZONTE-REVISTA DE ESTUDOS DE TEOLOGIA E CIENCIAS DA RELIGIAO, 2020, 18 (55): : 420 - 424
[10] Nikolaus Gallus' critique of Philip Melanchthon's teaching on the freedom of the will
Kolb, R
ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY, 2000, 91 : 87 - 110