Corn response to nitrogen rate, row spacing, and plant density in eastern Nebraska

被引:109
作者
Shapiro, Charles A.
Wortmann, Charles S.
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Haskell Agr Lab, NE Res & Extens Ctr, Concord, NE 68728 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2005.0137
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Efficient use of N by corn (Zea mays L.) is financially and environmentally important, and may be improved with higher plant density and reduced row spacing. Hypotheses were tested that irrigated corn yield in northeast Nebraska is increased by reducing row spacing from 0.76 in and increasing plant density above 61800 plants ha(-1), and that grain yield response to applied N is greater with reduced row spacing and increased plant density. Field experiments were conducted for 3 yr comparing the effects 0.76- vs. 0.51-m row spacing, three plant densities, and four N rates on crop performance. The soil was a silty clay loam (mesic Cumnlic Haplustoll). Nitrogen rates ranged from 0 to 252 kg N ha(-1). Plant N concentration and biomass and grain yield were not affected by plant density. Decreasing row spacing from 0.76 to 0.51 in resulted in 4% more grain yield. Grain yield response to applied N and N rates for optimum yield were not affected by row spacing. Nitrogen application resulted in mean increases of 22% more biomass production and 24% more grain yield. The N response function was linear in 1996, quadratic in 1997, and quadratic with decreased yields at the high N rate (252 kg N ha(-1)) in 1998. Grain yield was not affected by increasing plant density above 61800 plants ha(-1) but was greater with narrow row spacing. Yield response to applied N was similar for all planting arrangements. Optimal N rate cannot be better predicted by considering plant density and row spacing.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 535
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception [J].
Andrade, FH ;
Calviño, P ;
Cirilo, A ;
Barbieri, P .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (05) :975-980
[2]  
Binder DL, 2002, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V66, P531, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2002.0531
[3]   RESPONSE OF CORN TO NITROGEN-15-LABELED ANHYDROUS AMMONIA WITH AND WITHOUT NITRAPYRIN IN IOWA [J].
BLACKMER, AM ;
SANCHEZ, CA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1988, 80 (01) :95-102
[4]  
Bremner J.M., 1965, Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Agronomy 9:1149-1178, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.2.C32
[5]   A GROWTH ANALYSIS COMPARISON OF CORN GROWN IN CONVENTIONAL AND EQUIDISTANT PLANT SPACING [J].
BULLOCK, DG ;
NIELSEN, RL ;
NYQUIST, WE .
CROP SCIENCE, 1988, 28 (02) :254-258
[6]   CALCULATION OF OPTIMAL NITROGEN-FERTILIZER RATES [J].
BULLOCK, DS ;
BULLOCK, DG .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (05) :921-923
[7]   50 YEARS OF MINNESOTA CORN PRODUCTION - SOURCES OF YIELD INCREASE [J].
CARDWELL, VB .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (06) :984-990
[8]   Row spacing, plant density, and nitrogen effects on corn silage [J].
Cox, WJ ;
Cherney, DJR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (03) :597-602
[9]   A THEORY TO EXPLAIN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORN POPULATION AND GRAIN-YIELD [J].
DUNCAN, WG .
CROP SCIENCE, 1984, 24 (06) :1141-1145
[10]  
HERGERT G, 1995, G74174A U NEBR COOP