Central audit institutions and performance auditing: A comparative analysis of organizational strategies in the OECD

被引:58
作者
Barzelay, M
机构
[1] London School of Economics and Political Science, University of California-Berkeley
来源
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS | 1997年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0952-1895.411997041
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The New Public Management supplies a rationale for broadening the mandate of external audit institutions to encompass performance auditing. This article examines conceptual, empirical, and managerial issues raised by external performance auditing. Conceptually, performance auditing is a misnomer for a class of mainly evaluative review activities. Empirically, OECD countries vary in terms of the specific types of performance audits conducted by their principal external audit bodies. Explaining such variation offers some insight into the contemporary politics of public management policy. Managerially audit bodies whose mandate includes performance auditing confront two major strategic issues: whether to conduct such evaluative reviews in an auditing style and whether to gear their work to achieving performance improvement in auditee organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 260
页数:26
相关论文
共 55 条
[21]  
Hood C., 1991, ADM ARGUMENT
[22]  
HOOD CC, 1996, 2 LOND SCH EC
[23]  
Lakoff G., 1987, WOMEN FIRE DANGEROUS
[24]  
Lane J., 1990, I REFORM PUBLIC POLI
[25]  
LEEUW F, 1996, PERFORMANCE AUDITING
[26]  
LIGHT PAUL C., 1993, Monitoring Government: Inspectors General and the Search for Accountability
[27]  
MASHAW JERRY, 1990, The Struggle for Auto Safety
[28]  
Mashaw JerryL., 1983, Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims
[29]  
Metcalfe, 1990, IMPROVING PUBLIC MAN
[30]  
Meyer J., 1991, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, P143, DOI DOI 10.1177/017084069201300403