Evaluation of the Vascular Architecture of Focal Liver Lesions Using Micro Flow Imaging

被引:19
作者
Yang, Hong [1 ]
Liu, Guang-Jian [2 ,3 ]
Lu, Ming-De [2 ,4 ]
Xu, Hui-Xiong [2 ,3 ]
Xie, Xiao-Yan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Med Ultrason, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Ultrasound, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Med Ultrason, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast-enhanced sonography; focal liver lesions; micro flow imaging; vascular architecture; CONTRAST-ENHANCED-ULTRASOUND; HEPATIC-LESIONS; MICROVASCULAR ARCHITECTURE; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; SONOGRAPHY; AGENT; US; PATTERNS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.7863/ultra.32.7.1157
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives-To identify the vascular architecture of focal liver lesions using micro flow imaging and compare it with characteristics on contrast harmonic imaging during the arterial phase. Methods-Micro flow imaging and contrast harmonic imaging were performed in 118 patients with various focal liver lesions: hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 70), metastasis (n = 19), intrahepatic cholangio carcinoma (n = 3), lymphoma (n = 1), hemangioma (n = 17), and focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 8). The vascular architecture of the lesions on micro flow imaging was evaluated by 2 investigators independently to reveal 6 patterns (types I VI). Enhancement characteristics on contrast harmonic imaging were also evaluated. Results-Inter-reader agreement for delineating the vascular architecture was higher on contrast harmonic imaging (kappa = 0.856) than micro flow imaging (kappa = 0.613). On micro flow imaging, the vascular patterns of hepatocellular carcinomas were types I (28.6%), II (65.7%), and III (5.7%). On contrast harmonic imaging, 44 of 70 (62.9%) hepatocellular carcinomas showed chaotic vessels, of which 40 were type II and 4 were type II. The vascular patterns of metastases were types IV (78.9%), I(10.5%), and II (10.5%). Typical rim enhancement was identified in 57.9% of metastases on contrast harmonic imaging, and all were type IV. The vascular patterns of focal nodular hyperplasia were types VI (87.5%) and I (12.5%). Typical spoked wheel arteries were identified on contrast harmonic imaging in 2 focal nodular hyperplasia cases. The vascular patterns of hemangiomas were types V (94.1%) and II (5.9%). Typical peripheral nodular enhancement was identified in 88.2% of hemangiomas on contrast harmonic imaging, and all were type V. The chi(2) test revealed that differences in vascular architecture between the lesions were significant on micro flow imaging (P<.001). Conclusions-Micro flow imaging permitted detailed delineation of the vascular architecture of focal liver lesions. Hepatocellular carcinoma, metastasis, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hemangioma showed characteristic vascular architecture.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1171
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US [J].
Brannigan, M ;
Burns, PN ;
Wilson, SR .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 (04) :921-935
[2]   Real-time harmonic contrast material-specific US of focal liver lesions [J].
Catalano, O ;
Nunziata, A ;
Lobianco, R ;
Siani, A .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 (02) :333-349
[3]   Terminology for contrast-enhanced sonography - A practical glossary [J].
Catalano, Orlando ;
Migaleddu, Vincenzo ;
Quaia, Emilio ;
Caruso, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (06) :717-730
[4]   Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) -: Update 2008 [J].
Claudon, M. ;
Cosgrove, D. ;
Albrecht, T. ;
Bolondi, L. ;
Bosio, M. ;
Calliada, F. ;
Correas, J. -M. ;
Darge, K. ;
Dietrich, C. ;
D'Onofrio, M. ;
Evans, D. H. ;
Filice, C. ;
Greiner, L. ;
Jaeger, K. ;
de Jong, N. ;
Leen, E. ;
Lencioni, R. ;
Lindsell, D. ;
Martegani, A. ;
Meairs, S. ;
Nolsoe, C. ;
Piscaglia, F. ;
Ricci, P. ;
Seidel, G. ;
Skjoldbye, B. ;
Solbiati, L. ;
Thorelius, L. ;
Tranquart, F. ;
Weskott, H. P. ;
Whittingham, T. .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2008, 29 (01) :28-44
[5]   Ultrasound contrast agents:: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts [J].
Correas, JM ;
Bridal, L ;
Lesavre, A ;
Méjean, A ;
Claudon, M ;
Hélénon, O .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (08) :1316-1328
[6]   Characterisation of focal liver lesions with contrast enhanced ultrasonography [J].
Dietrich, CF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 51 :S9-S17
[7]  
EDMONDSON HA, 1954, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V7, P462, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-E
[9]   Influence of bubble size distribution on the echogenicity of ultrasound contrast agents -: A study of SonoVue™ [J].
Gorce, JM ;
Arditi, M ;
Schneider, M .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (11) :661-671
[10]   Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors by using contrast enhancement patterns at US [J].
Isozaki, T ;
Numata, K ;
Kiba, T ;
Hara, K ;
Morimoto, M ;
Sakaguchi, T ;
Sekihara, H ;
Kubota, T ;
Shimada, H ;
Morizane, T ;
Tanaka, K .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (03) :798-805