Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment

被引:185
作者
Aubin, J. [1 ]
Papatryphon, E. [2 ]
van der Werf, H. M. G. [1 ]
Chatzifotis, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Agrocampus Rennes, Sol Agron Spatialisat, UMR1069, F-35042 Rennes, France
[2] European Food Safety Author EFSA, Sci Cooperat Unit, I-431 Parma, Italy
[3] Hellen Ctr Marine Res, Inst Aquaculture, G-71003 Iraklion, Greece
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; Production systems; Fish farming; TURBOT SCOPHTHALMUS-MAXIMUS; EUROPEAN SEA-BASS; DICENTRARCHUS-LABRAX; COASTAL AREAS; FISH; AQUACULTURE; NUTRIENT; MARICULTURE; PHOSPHORUS; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
When evaluating the environmental impacts of finfish production systems, both regional impacts (e.g., eutrophication) and global impacts (e.g., climate change) should be taken into account. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method is well suited for this purpose. Three fish farms that represent contrasting intensive production systems were investigated using LCA: rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in freshwater raceways in France, sea-bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in sea cages in Greece, and turbot (Scophtalmus maximus) in an inland re-circulating system close to the seashore in France. Two main characteristics differentiated the three farm systems: feed use and energy use. Emission of nitrogen and phosphorus accounted for more than 90% of each farm's potential eutrophication impact. In the trout and sea-bass systems, feed production was the major contributor to potential climate change and acidification impacts and net primary production use (NPPU). In these systems, the main source of variation for environmental impacts was the feed conversion ratio. Results from this study indicate that the sea-bass cage system was less efficient than the trout raceway system, with a higher level of potential eutrophication (65% greater) and NPPU (15% greater). The turbot re-circulating system was a high energy-consumer compared to the trout raceway system (four times higher) and the sea-bass cage system (five times higher). Potential climate change and acidification impacts were largely influenced by energy consumption in the turbot re-circulating system. In the turbot re-circulating system 86% of energy use was due to on-site consumption, while in the sea-bass cage farming system 72% of energy use was due to feed production. These results are discussed in relation to regional contexts of production and focus attention on the sensitivity of each aquatic environment and the use of energy carriers. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 361
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental Impact Analysis on Residential Building in Malaysia Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz
    Idris, Juferi
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03)
  • [42] Reducing the environmental impact of food service in universities using life cycle assessment
    Sherry, Jesse
    Tivona, Shannon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (07) : 1469 - 1481
  • [43] Is aquaponics good for the environment?-evaluation of environmental impact through life cycle assessment studies on aquaponics systems
    Greenfeld, Asael
    Becker, Nir
    Bornman, Janet F.
    Spatari, Sabrina
    Angel, Dror L.
    AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 30 (01) : 305 - 322
  • [44] Environmental impact assessment of pesticide use within the framework of Life Cycle Assessment
    Heuer, E
    Flake, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2000, : 735 - 744
  • [45] Life Cycle Assessment for Environmental Impact Reduction and Evaluation of the Energy Indices in Lettuce Production
    Mousavi, Ali
    Aghbolaghi, Ebrahim Asadi
    Khorramifar, Ali
    Gancarz, Marek
    Darvishi, Yousef
    Stasiak, Mateusz
    Miernik, Anna
    Karami, Hamed
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (20):
  • [46] ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF CONVERTER STEELMAKING BASED ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    Liu, Huimin
    Li, Qiqiang
    Ding, Ran
    Li, Guanguan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2021, 17 (02): : 499 - 509
  • [47] Environmental assessment of different technologies for bioethanol production from Cynara cardunculus: A Life Cycle Assessment study
    Espada, Juan J.
    Villalobos, Hector
    Rodriguez, Rosalia
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2021, 144
  • [48] Environmental Potential Impact on Biofuel Production from Thermal Cracking of Palm Shell Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Rusdianasari
    Utarina, Leila
    Kalsum, Leila
    Wulandari, Daya
    Bow, Yohandri
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 23 (12): : 61 - 67
  • [49] Environmental Impact Comparison of Different Structure Systems Based on Life Cycle Assessment Methodology
    Xiong, Haibei
    Zhang, Chao
    Yeo, Jiangtao
    Zhao, Yang
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN ENVIRONMENT AND BUILDING MATERIAL, PTS 1-4, 2012, 374-377 : 405 - +
  • [50] Environmental impact assessment of southern tehran wastewater treatment plant using life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Samsami, Zeinab
    Jafari, Ahmad Jonidi
    Delnavaz, Mohammad
    Naderi, Azra
    Rashvanlou, Reza Barati
    Inchehboroun, Behnam Movassagh
    Dehghanifard, Emad
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):