Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment

被引:185
|
作者
Aubin, J. [1 ]
Papatryphon, E. [2 ]
van der Werf, H. M. G. [1 ]
Chatzifotis, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Agrocampus Rennes, Sol Agron Spatialisat, UMR1069, F-35042 Rennes, France
[2] European Food Safety Author EFSA, Sci Cooperat Unit, I-431 Parma, Italy
[3] Hellen Ctr Marine Res, Inst Aquaculture, G-71003 Iraklion, Greece
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; Production systems; Fish farming; TURBOT SCOPHTHALMUS-MAXIMUS; EUROPEAN SEA-BASS; DICENTRARCHUS-LABRAX; COASTAL AREAS; FISH; AQUACULTURE; NUTRIENT; MARICULTURE; PHOSPHORUS; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
When evaluating the environmental impacts of finfish production systems, both regional impacts (e.g., eutrophication) and global impacts (e.g., climate change) should be taken into account. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method is well suited for this purpose. Three fish farms that represent contrasting intensive production systems were investigated using LCA: rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in freshwater raceways in France, sea-bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in sea cages in Greece, and turbot (Scophtalmus maximus) in an inland re-circulating system close to the seashore in France. Two main characteristics differentiated the three farm systems: feed use and energy use. Emission of nitrogen and phosphorus accounted for more than 90% of each farm's potential eutrophication impact. In the trout and sea-bass systems, feed production was the major contributor to potential climate change and acidification impacts and net primary production use (NPPU). In these systems, the main source of variation for environmental impacts was the feed conversion ratio. Results from this study indicate that the sea-bass cage system was less efficient than the trout raceway system, with a higher level of potential eutrophication (65% greater) and NPPU (15% greater). The turbot re-circulating system was a high energy-consumer compared to the trout raceway system (four times higher) and the sea-bass cage system (five times higher). Potential climate change and acidification impacts were largely influenced by energy consumption in the turbot re-circulating system. In the turbot re-circulating system 86% of energy use was due to on-site consumption, while in the sea-bass cage farming system 72% of energy use was due to feed production. These results are discussed in relation to regional contexts of production and focus attention on the sensitivity of each aquatic environment and the use of energy carriers. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 361
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of environment impacts of egg production chain using life cycle assessment
    Ghasempour, Atena
    Ahmadi, Ebrahim
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 183 : 980 - 987
  • [32] Environmental life cycle assessment of reverse osmosis desalination: The influence of different life cycle impact assessment methods on the characterization results
    Zhou, Jin
    Chang, Victor W. -C.
    Fane, Anthony G.
    DESALINATION, 2011, 283 : 227 - 236
  • [33] Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: A review of life cycle assessment studies
    Almeida, Cheila
    Loubet, Philippe
    da Costa, Tamiris Pacheco
    Quinteiro, Paula
    Laso, Jara
    de Sousa, David Baptista
    Cooney, Ronan
    Mellett, Sinead
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Rodriguez, Carlos Jose
    Rowan, Neil
    Clifford, Eoghan
    Ruiz-Salmon, Israel
    Margallo, Maria
    Aldaco, Ruben
    Nunes, Maria Leonor
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    Marques, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (06) : 1961 - 1978
  • [34] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of raw silk production in China
    Wu, Zhaoshan
    Xu, Wenqiang
    Wu, Xiongying
    Ding, Xuemei
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2025, 55 : 11 - 23
  • [35] Assessing the economic and environmental impact of jasmine rice production: Life cycle assessment and Life Cycle Costs analysis
    Jirapornvaree, Ittisak
    Suppadit, Tawadchai
    Kumar, Vikas
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 303
  • [36] Evaluation of environmental impacts of cotton polo shirt production in Bangladesh using life cycle assessment
    Islam, Shafiqul
    Hasan, A. K. M. Mehedi
    Bhuiyan, Muhammad Abdur Rahman
    Bhat, Gajanan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 926
  • [37] An environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Living Wall Systems
    Oquendo-Di Cosola, V.
    Olivieri, F.
    Ruiz-Garcia, L.
    Bacenetti, J.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 254
  • [38] Environmental Impact Evaluation of Cropping Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Study of Central Tunisia
    Jouini, Meriem
    Biard, Yannick
    Benaissa, Nadhira
    Burte, Julien
    Amara, Hajer
    Sinfort, Carole
    RECENT ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE FROM THE EURO-MEDITERRANEAN AND SURROUNDING REGIONS, VOLS I AND II, 2018, : 287 - 289
  • [39] Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment
    Llorens, Berta
    Pomar, Candido
    Goyette, Bernard
    Rajagopal, Rajinikanth
    Andretta, Ines
    Latorre, Maria Angeles
    Remus, Aline
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102
  • [40] A well to pump life cycle environmental impact assessment of some hydrogen production routes
    Siddiqui, Osamah
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (12) : 5773 - 5786