Developing an Improved Statistical Approach for Survival Estimation in Bone Metastases Management: The Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival (BMETS) Model

被引:28
作者
Alcorn, Sara R. [1 ]
Fiksel, Jacob [2 ]
Wright, Jean L. [1 ]
Elledge, Christen R. [1 ]
Smith, Thomas J. [3 ]
Perng, Powell [1 ]
Saleemi, Sarah [1 ]
McNutt, Todd R. [1 ]
DeWeese, Theodore L. [1 ]
Zeger, Scott [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol & Mol Radiat Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2020年 / 108卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PALLIATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; LIFE EXPECTANCY; CANCER-PATIENTS; RANDOM FORESTS; PROGNOSIS; COUNTS; INDEX; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether a machine learning approach optimizes survival estimation for patients with symptomatic bone metastases (SBM), we developed the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival (BMETS) to predict survival using 27 prognostic covariates. To establish its relative clinical utility, we compared BMETS with 2 simpler Cox regression models used in this setting. Methods and Materials: For 492 bone sites in 397 patients evaluated for palliative radiation therapy (RT) for SBM from January 2007 to January 2013, data for 27 clinical variables were collected. These covariates and the primary outcome of time from consultation to death were used to build BMETS using random survival forests. We then performed Cox regressions as per 2 validated models: Chow's 3-item (C-3) and Westhoff's 2-item (W-2) tools. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation procedures and measured by time-dependent area under the curve (tAUC) for all 3 models. For temporal validation, a separate data set comprised of 104 bone sites treated in 85 patients in 2018 was used to estimate tAUC from BMETS. Results: Median survival was 6.4 months. Variable importance was greatest for performance status, blood cell counts, recent systemic therapy type, and receipt of concurrent nonbone palliative RT. tAUC at 3, 6, and 12 months was 0.83, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively, suggesting excellent discrimination of BMETS across postconsultation time points. BMETS outperformed simpler models at each time, with respective tAUC at each time of 0.78, 0.76, and 0.74 for the C-3 model and 0.80, 0.78, and 0.77 for the W-2 model. For the temporal validation set, respective tAUC was similarly high at 0.86, 0.82, and 0.78. Conclusions: For patients with SBM, BMETS improved survival predictions versus simpler traditional models. Model performance was maintained when applied to a temporal validation set. To facilitate clinical use, we developed a web platform for data entry and display of BMETS-predicted survival probabilities. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 563
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Pilot Assessment of the BMET Decision Support Platform: A Tool to Improve Provider Survival Estimates and Selection of Prognosis-Appropriate Treatment for Patients with Symptomatic Bone Metastases [J].
Alcorn, S. R. ;
Fiksel, J. ;
Hu, C. ;
Wright, J. L. ;
Kleinberg, L. R. ;
Levin, A. S. ;
Smith, T. ;
Cheng, Z. ;
Elledge, C. R. ;
Kim, K. ;
Rao, A. D. ;
Sloan, L. ;
Page, B. R. ;
Stinson, S. F. ;
Voong, R. ;
McNutt, T. R. ;
Bowers, M. R. ;
DeWeese, T. L. ;
Zeger, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01) :S47-S47
[2]  
Biau G, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P1063
[3]   Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks [J].
Blanche, Paul ;
Dartigues, Jean-Francois ;
Jacqmin-Gadda, Helene .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (30) :5381-5397
[4]   Oral targeted therapy for cancer [J].
Carrington, Christine .
AUSTRALIAN PRESCRIBER, 2015, 38 (05) :171-176
[5]   RECURSIVE PARTITIONING ANALYSIS INDEX IS PREDICTIVE FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SPINE STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY FOR SPINAL METASTASES [J].
Chao, Samuel T. ;
Koyfman, Shlomo A. ;
Woody, Neil ;
Angelov, Lilyana ;
Soeder, Sherry L. ;
Reddy, Chandana A. ;
Rybicki, Lisa A. ;
Djemil, Toufik ;
Suh, John H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (05) :1738-1743
[6]   Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma: final overall survival results of the randomized BRIM-3 study [J].
Chapman, P. B. ;
Robert, C. ;
Larkin, J. ;
Haanen, J. B. ;
Ribas, A. ;
Hogg, D. ;
Hamid, O. ;
Ascierto, P. A. ;
Testori, A. ;
Lorigan, P. C. ;
Dummer, R. ;
Sosman, J. A. ;
Flaherty, K. T. ;
Chang, I. ;
Coleman, S. ;
Caro, I. ;
Hauschild, A. ;
McArthur, G. A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (10) :2581-2587
[7]  
Chionh F, 2010, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V7
[8]   Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer [J].
Chow, Edward ;
Abdolell, Mohamed ;
Panzarella, Tony ;
Harris, Kristin ;
Bezjak, Andrea ;
Warde, Padraig ;
Tannock, Ian .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (36) :5863-5869
[9]   Is baseline quality of life useful for predicting survival with hormone-refractory prostate cancer?: A pooled analysis of three studies of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group [J].
Collette, L ;
van Andel, G ;
Bottomley, A ;
Oosterhof, GON ;
Albrecht, W ;
de Reijke, TM ;
Fossà, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (19) :3877-3885
[10]   Calibrating random forests for probability estimation [J].
Dankowski, Theresa ;
Ziegler, Andreas .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (22) :3949-3960