Impact of Currently Used or Potentially Useful Insecticides for Canola Agroecosystems on Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Megachile rotundata (Hymentoptera: Megachilidae), and Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

被引:97
作者
Scott-Dupree, C. D. [1 ]
Conroy, L. [1 ]
Harris, C. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Environm Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
bumble bee; alfalfa leafcutting bee; O; lignaria; insecticides; direct contact toxicity; BEES APIS-MELLIFERA; HONEY-BEES; POLLINATOR DECLINES; CROP POLLINATION; FORAGING ABILITY; COLONY HEALTH; TOXICITY; CLOTHIANIDIN; PESTICIDES; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1603/029.102.0125
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Pest management practices may be contributing to a decline in wild bee populations in or near canola (Brassica napus L.) agroecosystems. The objective of this study was to investigate the direct contact toxicity of five technical grade insecticides-imidacloprid, clothianidin, deltamethrin, spinosad, and novaluron-currently used, or with potential for use in canola integrated pest management on bees that may forage in canola: common eastern humble bees [Bombus impatiens (Cresson); hereafter humble bees], alfalfa leafcutting bees [Megachile rotundata (F.)], and Osmia lignaria Cresson. Clothianidin and to a lesser extent imidacloprid were highly toxic to all three species, deltamethrin and spinosad were intermediate in toxicity, and novaluron was nontoxic. Bumble bees were generally more tolerant to the direct contact applications > O. lignaria > leafcutting bees. However, differences in relative toxicities between the three species were not consistent, e.g., whereas clothianidin was only 4.9 and 1.3x more toxic, deltamethrin was 5.3 and 68x more toxic to leafcutting bees than to bumblebees and O. lignaria, respectively. Laboratory assessment of direct contact toxicity, although useful, is only one measure of potential impact, and mortality under field conditions may differ greatly depending on management practices. Research conducted using only honey bees as the indicator species may not adequately reflect the risk posed by insecticides to wild bees because of their unique biology and differential susceptibility. Research programs focused on determining nontarget impact on pollinators should be expanded to include not only the honey bee but also wild bee species representative of the agricultural system under investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 182
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Abbott VA, 2008, J ECON ENTOMOL, V101, P784, DOI 10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[784:LASEOI]2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] ABBOTT W.S., 1925, J ECON ENTOMOL, V18, P265
  • [4] *AGR CAN, 1989, AGR CAN PUBL E, V1495
  • [5] Allen-Wardell G, 1998, CONSERV BIOL, V12, P8
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2000, CROP POLLINATION BEE
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1999, POLLINATION 4 SPECIE
  • [8] Contact and oral toxicity to honey bees (Apis mellifera) of agents registered for use for sweet corn insect control in Ontario, Canada
    Bailey, J
    Scott-Dupree, C
    Harris, R
    Tolman, J
    Harris, B
    [J]. APIDOLOGIE, 2005, 36 (04) : 623 - 633
  • [9] *CAN COUNC CAN, 2007, GROW CAN
  • [10] TEMPERATURE AND THE POLLINATING ACTIVITY OF SOCIAL BEES
    CORBET, SA
    FUSSELL, M
    AKE, R
    FRASER, A
    GUNSON, C
    SAVAGE, A
    SMITH, K
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1993, 18 (01) : 17 - 30