Biological control of Canada thistle in temperate pastures using high density rotational cattle grazing

被引:44
作者
De Bruijn, SL [1 ]
Bork, EW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Agr Food & Nutrit Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
关键词
biomass; cattle; Cirsium arvense; flowering; grazing systems; interspecific competition; trampling; utilization; weed density;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.10.007
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Extensive research exists on the effects of Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] (CT) in annual cropland, but few Studies have examined CT impacts on pasture and rangeland. While it is known that grazing impacts weed presence and abundance, little is understood about how specific grazing systems can be used as a prescriptive tool to alter weed populations, including CT. The purpose of this study was to experimentally test three cattle grazing systems, including (1) continuous or season-long grazing (SL), (2) short duration (SD) (or low intensity-high frequency) rotational grazing, and (3) high intensity-low frequency (HILF) rotational grazing, for their ability to reduce CT and release non-CT herbage within permanent pastures of central Alberta, Canada. A secondary objective was to evaluate season-long changes in the quality of CT shoots as potential forage throughout the growing season. Results showed that SL grazing maintained or increased severe CT infestations and reduced forage yield. In contrast, the HILF rotational system reduced CT shoot density and biomass, as well as flowering, and resulted in greater weed suppression than the SID system. Two intense defoliations annually over 2-3 years nearly eliminated CT stems. Remaining CT shoots were also primarily vegetative and greater in forage quality under HILF grazing. As a weed biological control tool for CT, prescribed grazing with an HILF system may be particularly important ill areas where other control options, including the use of herbicides, are not possible due to environmental restrictions or inaccessibility to equipment. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 315
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Agriculture Canada Expert Committee on Soil Survey, 1987, CAN SYST SOIL CLASS
[2]   SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT AND VEGETATIVE SPREAD OF CIRSIUM-ARVENSE (L) SCOP IN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA [J].
AMOR, RL ;
HARRIS, RV .
WEED RESEARCH, 1975, 15 (06) :407-411
[3]   CONTROL OF CIRSIUM-ARVENSE-(L)-SCOP - BY HERBICIDES AND MOWING [J].
AMOR, RL ;
HARRIS, RV .
WEED RESEARCH, 1977, 17 (05) :303-309
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, OFF METH AN, V16th
[6]   DOES HERBIVORY BENEFIT PLANTS - A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE [J].
BELSKY, AJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1986, 127 (06) :870-892
[7]  
Bonham C.D., 1989, Measurements for terrestrial vegetation
[8]  
BOURDOT GW, 1986, P 39 NZ WEED PEST CO, P183
[9]  
Bullock JM, 2001, J APPL ECOL, V38, P253, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00599.x
[10]   Sagebrush ingestion by lambs: Effects of experience and macronutrients [J].
Burritt, EA ;
Banner, RE ;
Provenza, FD .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 2000, 53 (01) :91-96