Treatment decisions in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer patients with intermediate oncotype DX recurrence score results

被引:16
作者
Fried, Georgeta [1 ]
Moskovitz, Mor [1 ]
机构
[1] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, IL-31096 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Adjuvant chemotherapy; Breast cancer; Decision making; Intermediate risk; Oncotype DX; Recurrence score; GENE-EXPRESSION; ASSAY; IMPACT; WOMEN; RISK; CHEMOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; TAMOXIFEN; PREDICT;
D O I
10.1186/2193-1801-3-71
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This retrospective study evaluated the impact of intermediate Recurrence Score (R) results on adjuvant treatment decisions in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early invasive breast cancer, comparing treatment recommendations pre-testing with actual treatments received post-testing. Of the 111 patients included in the analysis, 78 (70.3%) had hormonal therapy (HT) and 33 (29.7%) had chemohormonal therapy (CHT) recommendations pre-testing. The Recurrence Score was significantly higher in those with a pre-testing CHT recommendation compared with those with a pre-testing HT recommendation (median of 24 vs. 22; P = 0.047; Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon [MWW] test). Post-testing, treatment of 24 patients (21.6%) was different from their pre-testing recommendation. The difference between CHT recommendation rate pre-testing and the rate of CHT received post-testing was nonsignificant for the entire cohort and for patients' subgroups (by age, tumor size, and grade) (P > 0.17; McNemar's test). Following classification of the cohort into two Recurrence Score subcategories (low-intermediate, [18-25]; high-intermediate, [26-30]), changes in treatment decisions (pre-testing recommendations vs. actual treatments received post testing) were reported for 16.5% of low-intermediate and 34.4% of high-intermediate patients. Post-testing, the rate of CHT decreased (by 58%) in the low-intermediate subcategory and increased (by 64%) in the high-intermediate subcategory (P < 0.01, both subcategories). In logistic regression analyses, the Recurrence Score subcategory was the only significant predictor of changes in treatment decisions (pre-testing recommendations vs. actual treatments received post testing; P < 0.01). The only significant difference between the two subsets of patients with such a change (HT to CHT, 11 patients; CHT to HT, 13 patients) was the Recurrence Score (median of 28 vs. 20, respectively; P = 0.0014; MWW test). These findings demonstrate that intermediate Recurrence Score results provide clinically relevant information and impact treatment decisions in ER + early breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence Using the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Node-Negative and Node-Positive Postmenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Anastrozole or Tamoxifen: A TransATAC Study [J].
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Wale, Christopher ;
Forbes, John ;
Mallon, Elizabeth A. ;
Salter, Janine ;
Quinn, Emma ;
Dunbier, Anita ;
Baum, Michael ;
Buzdar, Aman ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Bugarini, Roberto ;
Baehner, Frederick L. ;
Shak, Steven .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (11) :1829-1834
[12]   The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use [J].
Eiermann, W. ;
Rezai, M. ;
Kuemmel, S. ;
Kuehn, T. ;
Warm, M. ;
Friedrichs, K. ;
Schneeweiss, A. ;
Markmann, S. ;
Eggemann, H. ;
Hilfrich, J. ;
Jackisch, C. ;
Witzel, I. ;
Eidtmann, H. ;
Bachinger, A. ;
Hell, S. ;
Blohmer, J. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (03) :618-624
[13]   The impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on decision making about adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in an oncology practice with a unified treatment policy [J].
Geffen, D. B. ;
Abu-Ghanem, S. ;
Sion-Vardy, N. ;
Braunstein, R. ;
Tokar, M. ;
Ariad, S. ;
Delgado, B. ;
Bayme, M. ;
Koretz, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (11) :2381-2386
[14]  
Gligorov J, 2012, AM SOC CLIN ONC ASCO
[15]   Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features [J].
Goldstein, Lori J. ;
Gray, Robert ;
Badve, Sunil ;
Childs, Barrett H. ;
Yoshizawa, Carl ;
Rowley, Steve ;
Shak, Steven ;
Baehner, Frederick L. ;
Ravdin, Peter M. ;
Davidson, Nancy E. ;
Sledge, George W., Jr. ;
Perez, Edith A. ;
Shulman, Lawrence N. ;
Martino, Silvana ;
Sparano, Joseph A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (25) :4063-4071
[16]   A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients [J].
Habel, Laurel A. ;
Shak, Steven ;
Jacobs, Marlena K. ;
Capra, Angela ;
Alexander, Claire ;
Pho, Mylan ;
Baker, Joffre ;
Walker, Michael ;
Watson, Drew ;
Hackett, James ;
T Blick, Noelle ;
Greenberg, Deborah ;
Fehrenbacher, Louis ;
Langholz, Bryan ;
Quesenberry, Charles P. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (03)
[17]   The Influence of a Gene Expression Profile on Breast Cancer Decisions [J].
Henry, Leonard R. ;
Stojadinovic, Alexander ;
Swain, Sandra M. ;
Prindiville, Sheila ;
Cordes, Rose ;
Soballe, Peter W. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 99 (06) :319-323
[18]   A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the UK [J].
Holt, S. ;
Bertelli, G. ;
Humphreys, I. ;
Valentine, W. ;
Durrani, S. ;
Pudney, D. ;
Rolles, M. ;
Moe, M. ;
Khawaja, S. ;
Sharaiha, Y. ;
Brinkworth, E. ;
Whelan, S. ;
Jones, S. ;
Bennett, H. ;
Phillips, C. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (11) :2250-2258
[19]  
In R, 2011, GLOB BREAST CANC C G
[20]   Breast Medical Oncologists' Use of Standard Prognostic Factors to Predict a 21-Gene Recurrence Score [J].
Kamal, Arif H. ;
Loprinzi, Charles L. ;
Reynolds, Carol ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Geiger, Xochiquetzal J. ;
Ingle, James N. ;
Carlson, Robert W. ;
Hobday, Timothy J. ;
Winer, Eric P. ;
Goetz, Matthew P. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (10) :1359-1366