Text-to-speech accommodations for the reading challenges of adults with traumatic brain injury

被引:8
作者
Harvey, Judy [1 ]
Hux, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Barkley Mem Ctr, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
Brain injury; reading; text-to-speech technology; COMPUTER SPEECH; COMPREHENSION; STUDENTS; INSTRUCTION; DISORDERS; CHILDREN; BENEFITS; AVERAGE; READERS; RATES;
D O I
10.3109/02699052.2015.1022878
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: This study's purpose was two-fold: (a) to confirm differences in silent reading rates of individuals with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) and (b) to determine the effect of text-to-speech (TTS) on reading comprehension and efficiency by individuals with TBI. Design and methods: Ten adults with severe TBI answered comprehension questions about written passages presented in three conditions: reading only (RO), listening to ITS presentation only (LO) or reading and listening to TTS simultaneously (RL). The researchers compared reading rate, comprehension accuracy and comprehension rate (efficiency) across conditions. Results: Analysis revealed significantly slower silent reading rates for the participants with TBI than for readers without TBI (n=75). Also, participants with TBI achieved higher comprehension accuracy for factual than inferential questions; however, no significant main effect for comprehension accuracy emerged across reading conditions. In contrast, using comprehension rate as the dependent measure, analysis confirmed a significant main effect for reading condition and question type; post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that the RL condition yielded higher comprehension rate scores than the RO condition. Conclusions: As a group, adults with TBI appear to benefit in reading efficiency when simultaneously listening to and reading written passages; however, differences exist that reinforce the importance of individualizing treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 897
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   EFFICACY OF TALKING BOOKS FOR A GROUP OF READING DISABLED BOYS [J].
ABELSON, AG ;
PETERSEN, M .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1983, 57 (02) :567-570
[2]   Assisting Students With a Traumatic Brain Injury in School Interventions [J].
Aldrich, Erin M. ;
Obrzut, John E. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (04) :291-301
[3]   Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations [J].
Anderson-Inman, Lynne ;
Horney, Mark A. .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2007, 42 (01) :153-160
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1977, EXPLORATORY DATA ANA
[5]   MEASURING THE DURATION OF POST TRAUMATIC AMNESIA [J].
ARTIOLAIFORTUNY, L ;
BRIGGS, M ;
NEWCOMBE, F ;
RATCLIFF, G ;
THOMAS, C .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1980, 43 (05) :377-379
[6]   Predicting late outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury referred to a rehabilitation programme: a study of 508 Finnish patients 5 years or more after injury [J].
Asikainen, I ;
Kaste, M ;
Sarna, S .
BRAIN INJURY, 1998, 12 (02) :95-107
[7]  
Baljathy E., 2005, Reading Online, V8, P1
[8]  
Brown J., 1993, NELSON DENNY READING
[9]   Impaired discourse gist and working memory in children after brain injury [J].
Chapman, SB ;
Gamino, JF ;
Cook, LG ;
Hanten, G ;
Li, XQ ;
Levin, HS .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 97 (02) :178-188
[10]  
Cook L.G., 2011, PERSPECTIVENEUROPH, V21, P33, DOI DOI 10.1044/NNSLD21.1.33