Measuring the Impact of NextGen Operating Concepts for Separation Assurance on Pilot Situation Awareness and Workload

被引：8

作者：

Strybel, Thomas Z. ^{[1
]}

Vu, Kim-Phuong L. ^{[1
]}

Battiste, Vernol ^{[2
,3
]}

Johnson, Walter ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Psychol, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA

[2] San Jose State Univ Fdn, San Jose, CA USA

[3] NASA Ames Res Ctr, Moffett Field, CA USA

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY | 2013年 / 23卷 / 01期

基金：

美国国家航空航天局;

关键词：

AIR-TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; CONTROLLER; PERFORMANCE; AUTOMATION;

D O I：

10.1080/10508414.2013.746156

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

We determined the effect of NextGen concepts of operation for separation assurance on pilot situation awareness and workload using an online probe technique. We also evaluated the probe technique for sensitivity, diagnosticity, and validity with respect to different NextGen separation assurance operating concepts. These concepts allocated responsibility for conflict detection and resolution to either pilots, air traffic controllers, or an automated, ground-based, conflict detection and resolution agent. Probe queries were developed to fit in 1 of 3 categories: traffic conflicts, aircraft or airspace status, or commands and communications. We determined that pilot situation awareness of conflict information was highest when the pilot was responsible for separation assurance; workload was minimally affected. Moreover, the changes in pilot awareness of task-specific information can be determined using this online probe technique. Evidence for the reliability and validity of our probe technique is also provided.

引用

页码：1 / 26

页数：26

共 43 条

[1]

[Anonymous], AGARDCP478

[2]

Bacon L.P., 2011, Proceedings of the 16n International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, P32

[3]

Battiste V., 2002, 20025825 ATIO AM I A

[4] Mechanisms for the acquisition of situation awareness in situated agents [J].

Chiappe, Dan L. ;

Strybel, Thomas Z. ;

Vu, Kim-Phuong L. .

THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2012, 13 (06) :625-647

[5]

D'Arcy J.F., 2001, AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL

[6]

DiMeo K., 2001, 4 INT AIR TRAFF MAN

[7]

Durso F.T., 2004, COGNITIVE APPROACH S, P137, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315263977-16/SPAM-REAL-TIME-ASSESSMENT-SA-S%C3%A9BASTIEN-TREMBLAY-SIMON-BANBURY

[8] Does situation awareness add to the validity of cognitive tests? [J].

Durso, Francis T. ;

Bleckley, M. Kathryn ;

Dattel, Andrew R. .

HUMAN FACTORS, 2006, 48 (04) :721-733

[9] En route operational errors and situation awareness [J].

Durso, FT ;

Truitt, TR ;

Hackworth, CA ;

Crutchfield, JM ;

Manning, CA .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 8 (02) :177-194

[10]

Dwyer JP, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5618, P748, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02559-4_81

← 1 2 3 4 5 →