The synthetic geo-ecological environmental evaluation of a coastal coal-mining city using spatiotemporal big data: A case study in Longkou, China

被引:79
作者
He, Fuhong [1 ]
Gu, Lijuan [2 ]
Wang, Tao [1 ]
Zhang, Zhenhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludong Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Yantai 264025, Peoples R China
[2] NAAU, Inst Syst Sci & Math, Yantai 264001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Remote sensing; Analytic hierarchy process; Geo-ecological environmental assessment; Coal mine concentration area; HIERARCHY PROCESS; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The geological and ecological (geo-ecological) environment of the coastal coal-mining city is a basic element for human subsistence, and it connects the regional economy with social sustainable development. Using Longkou, a coastal mining city, as an example, a geological and ecological environmental quality assessment was conducted based on spatiotemporal big data. Remote sensing images, a digital. elevation model (DEM), and precipitation and interpolation processing were used to generate factor layers. A synthetic evaluation index system was set up, including physical geography, geological conditions, mining intensity, ecological environmental recovery and geological hazards associated with mining. Moreover, an analytical hierarchy process was used to calculate the factor weight of each evaluation factor, and a consistency check was performed to build an assessment model of the geo-ecological environment of Longlcou. The results indicate that multi-factor spatiotemporal big data provide a scientific assessment of the geo-ecological environmental quality with indispensable data and methods. The spatial distribution of geo-ecological environmental quality presented clear specialization of zonality, showing poor quality in the coastal coal mine ore concentration area and good quality in the inland and mountainous areas of Nanshan Mountain. The geo-ecological environmental quality of Longkou was divided into 5 levels as worst, poor, middle, good and better districts. The good and better districts accounted for 76.763% of the total area of the assessment region, indicating that the geo-ecological environmental quality of the study area was in good condition. The mining intensity and ecological environment recovery were major factors in determining the regional variation of the geo-ecological environment of Longkou. The possible causes inducing uncertainties and limitations in evaluation of the geo-ecological environmental quality were discussed. The model combining AHP with GIS proposed in this paper is an effective means of evaluating regional geo-ecological environmental quality. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 866
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Sustainable municipal solid waste management decision making Development and implementation of a single score sustainability index [J].
Ak, Hacer ;
Braida, Washington .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2015, 26 (06) :909-928
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, BIG DATA NEXT FRONTI
[3]   Integration of analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis for assessment and optimization of personnel productivity in a large industrial bank [J].
Azadeh, A. ;
Ghaderi, S. F. ;
Mirjalili, M. ;
Moghaddam, M. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (05) :5212-5225
[4]  
Calabrese A., 2015, J CLEAN PROD
[5]   Integrated spatio-temporal data mining for forest fire prediction [J].
Cheng, Tao ;
Wang, Jiaqiu .
Transactions in GIS, 2008, 12 (05) :591-611
[6]   Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment [J].
Cinelli, Marco ;
Coles, Stuart R. ;
Kirwan, Kerry .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 46 :138-148
[7]   A multicriteria method for environmental management system selection: an intellectual capital approach [J].
Dolores Guerrero-Baena, M. ;
Gomez-Limon, Jose A. ;
Vicente Fruet, J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 105 :428-437
[8]  
Ganguly AuroopR., 2008, Data Mining Workshops, P385, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICDMW.2008.30
[9]  
Kharat M.G., 2016, MANAG ENV QUAL, V27