Correlates of Bystander Intentions and Behavior among Community College Students in Situations of Sexual Violence

被引:4
作者
Moschella-Smith, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Potter, Sharyn J. [1 ]
Moynihan, Mary M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Prevent Innovat Res Ctr, 9 Madbury Rd,Suite 405, Durham, NH 03824 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PREVENTION | 2022年 / 43卷 / 02期
关键词
Sexual violence; Bystander behavior; Bystander intentions; Community colleges; MENTAL-HEALTH; PREVENTION; ASSAULT; WILLINGNESS; GENDER; ABUSE; VICTIMIZATION; PREDICTORS; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10935-021-00663-y
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Sexual violence (SV) is a public health problem on college campuses. Research suggests that bystanders can effectively prevent and respond in situations of SV. There is no research to date concerning correlates of bystander behavior (e.g., gender, perceptions of SV) on community college campuses. However, there are notable differences between students enrolled in two- and four-year colleges. We conducted two exploratory studies across seven community colleges in one northeastern state to examine correlates of bystander intentions and behavior. In Studies 1 and 2, the majority of respondents identified as women, heterosexual, and White. We administered online surveys that inquired about demographics, peer attitudes, knowledge of sexual consent, history of victimization, and intent to help (Study 1) or self-reported bystander behavior (Study 2). The first study (n = 1,067) demonstrated that gender (i.e., identifying as woman), less accepting peer attitudes toward SV, and greater knowledge of sexual consent and awareness of campus SV were significantly associated with bystander intentions. The second study (n = 1,506) indicated that age (i.e., younger than 25 years old), greater knowledge of sexual consent, and victimization history were associated with bystander behavior. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 295
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation
    Ajzen, I
    Brown, TC
    Carvajal, F
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (09) : 1108 - 1121
  • [2] American Association of Community Colleges, 2017, 2017 FACT SHEET
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, QuickFacts
  • [4] Armstrong ElizabethA. Laura Hamilton., 2015, PAYING PARTY
  • [5] Predictors of Sexual Assault-Specific Prosocial Bystander Behavior and Intentions: A Prospective Analysis
    Austin, Megan J. Murphy
    Dardis, Christina M.
    Wilson, Milo S.
    Gidycz, Christine A.
    Berkowitz, Alan D.
    [J]. VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2016, 22 (01) : 90 - 111
  • [6] Baime D., 2016, Community colleges: Multiple missions, diverse student bodies, and a range of policy solutions
  • [7] Banyard V.L., 2015, NEXT GENERATION BYST, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23171-6
  • [8] Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation
    Banyard, Victoria L.
    Moynihan, Mary M.
    Plante, Elizabethe G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 35 (04) : 463 - 481
  • [9] Academic Correlates of Unwanted Sexual Contact, Intercourse, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence: An Understudied but Important Consequence for College Students
    Banyard, Victoria L.
    Demers, Jennifer M.
    Cohn, Ellen S.
    Edwards, Katie M.
    Moynihan, Mary M.
    Walsh, Wendy A.
    Ward, Sally K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2020, 35 (21-22) : 4375 - 4392
  • [10] How Do We Know If It Works? Measuring Outcomes in Bystander-Focused Abuse Prevention on Campuses
    Banyard, Victoria L.
    Moynihan, Mary M.
    Cares, Alison C.
    Warner, Rebecca
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF VIOLENCE, 2014, 4 (01) : 101 - 115