Comparative Evaluation of Performance Assessment and Modeling Method for Software Architecture

被引:0
作者
Isa, M. A. [1 ]
Jawawi, Dayang N. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Syst, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia
来源
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, PT 3 | 2011年 / 181卷
关键词
Performance Assessment; Performance Model; Model Transformation; Software Performance Engineering; Model Driven Engineering; Unified Modeling Language (UML); Model Evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Conducting performance assessment during the early phases of system development enhances early design decisions of system design. The generated performance models from system design will help in identifying the potential performance problems in the system design based on the result of the performance assessment. In recent years, several methods for performance assessment and modeling have been proposed. This paper presents the comparative evaluation of performance assessment and modeling methods to discover the strengths and weaknesses of the existing methods based on a set of criteria which includes process and modeling elements that was developed with the purpose to represent a specific process to assess the performance attributes with the help of modeling concepts. The four selected methods were evaluated based on these criterions and the results will hopefully guidance for developers to propose better methods for performance assessment and modeling in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:764 / 776
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparative Analysis of Markovian Methodologies for Modeling Infrastructure System Performance [J].
Yamany, Mohamed S. ;
Abraham, Dulcy M. ;
Labi, Samuel .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2021, 27 (02)
[42]   A method for design and performance modeling of client/server systems [J].
Menascé, DA ;
Gomaa, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2000, 26 (11) :1066-1085
[43]   A Method for Template-based Architecture Modeling and its Application to Digital Twins [J].
Lehner, Daniel ;
Pfeiffer, Jerome ;
Klikovits, Stefan ;
Wortmann, Andreas ;
Wimmer, Manuel .
JOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 23 (03) :14-14
[44]   A Performance Evaluation Method for Climate Coupled Models [J].
Epicoco, Italo ;
Mocavero, Silvia ;
Aloisio, Giovanni .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE (ICCS), 2011, 4 :1526-1534
[45]   Software quality assurance in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant [J].
Froehlich, GK ;
Ogden, HC ;
Byle, KA .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2000, 69 (1-3) :421-427
[46]   Complex Conditions Modeling for the Performance Assessment of Logistics Service Organization [J].
Zang Hongyu .
PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2010, :1553-1556
[47]   A Method of Performance Assessment of PID Controller with Actuator Saturation [J].
Hao, Xia ;
Yu Mingli .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS, ELECTRONIC, INDUSTRIAL AND CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2015, 8 :824-828
[48]   Development of performance assessment method for drinking water infrastructure [J].
Suzuki, Y. ;
Adachi, W. ;
Amano, M. ;
Fujiwara, M. .
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2014, 63 (02) :162-169
[49]   APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS METHOD FOR ASSESSMENT OF CLUSTER PERFORMANCE [J].
Skokan, Karel .
FINANCE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE, 2013, :665-677
[50]   VelociTI: An Architecture-level Performance Modeling Framework for Trapped Ion Quantum Computers [J].
Hankin, Alexander ;
Mahmoud, Abdulrahman ;
Hempstead, Mark ;
Brooks, David ;
Wei, Gu-Yeon .
2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WORKLOAD CHARACTERIZATION, IISWC 2024, 2024, :156-168