Comparative Evaluation of Performance Assessment and Modeling Method for Software Architecture

被引：0
作者：
Isa, M. A. [1 ]
Jawawi, Dayang N. A. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Syst, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia
来源：
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, PT 3 | 2011年 / 181卷
关键词：
Performance Assessment; Performance Model; Model Transformation; Software Performance Engineering; Model Driven Engineering; Unified Modeling Language (UML); Model Evaluation;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
Conducting performance assessment during the early phases of system development enhances early design decisions of system design. The generated performance models from system design will help in identifying the potential performance problems in the system design based on the result of the performance assessment. In recent years, several methods for performance assessment and modeling have been proposed. This paper presents the comparative evaluation of performance assessment and modeling methods to discover the strengths and weaknesses of the existing methods based on a set of criteria which includes process and modeling elements that was developed with the purpose to represent a specific process to assess the performance attributes with the help of modeling concepts. The four selected methods were evaluated based on these criterions and the results will hopefully guidance for developers to propose better methods for performance assessment and modeling in the future.
引用
收藏
页码：764 / 776
页数：13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   PERFORMANCE MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES SPECIFIED THROUGH GRAPH TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
Naddaf, Mahdi Rahimi ;
Rafe, Vahid .
COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 2013, 32 (04) :797-826
[32]   Comparative performance assessment of pilot irrigation schemes in Uganda [J].
Wanyama, Joshua ;
Bwambale, Erion ;
Nakawuka, Prossie .
HELIYON, 2024, 10 (10)
[33]   A review and future directions of SOA-based software architecture modeling approaches for System of Systems [J].
Mohsin, Ahmad ;
Janjua, Naeem Khalid .
SERVICE ORIENTED COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 12 (3-4) :183-200
[34]   A review and future directions of SOA-based software architecture modeling approaches for System of Systems [J].
Ahmad Mohsin ;
Naeem Khalid Janjua .
Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2018, 12 (3-4) :183-200
[35]   Hierarchical Refined Modeling and Verification Method of Airborne Software Using SysML [J].
Xiao S.-H. ;
Liu Q. ;
Huang Y.-H. ;
Shi J.-Q. ;
Guo X. .
Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2022, 33 (08) :2851-2874
[36]   An efficient method for uncertainty propagation in robust software performance estimation [J].
Aleti, Aldeida ;
Trubiani, Catia ;
van Hoorn, Andre ;
Jamshidi, Pooyan .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2018, 138 :222-235
[37]   An Evaluation Method for Service-Oriented Architecture Maturity Model [J].
Hamzah, Mohd Hamdi Irwan ;
Fadzrin, Ezak .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 13 (07) :149-159
[38]   Performance Assessment and Modeling Techniques for Domestic Solar Dryers [J].
Shimpy ;
Kumar, Mahesh ;
Kumar, Anil .
FOOD ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2023, 15 (03) :525-547
[39]   Performance Assessment and Modeling Techniques for Domestic Solar Dryers [J].
Mahesh Shimpy ;
Anil Kumar .
Food Engineering Reviews, 2023, 15 :525-547
[40]   Performance Assessment of Software Defined Networks Management Protocol in Real Environments [J].
da Costa, Thiago S. ;
Silva, Jonathan de C. ;
Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C. ;
Rabelo, Ricardo A. L. ;
Kumar, Neeraj ;
Solic, Petar .
2019 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART AND SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES (SPLITECH), 2019, :203-207
12345