Comparative Evaluation of Performance Assessment and Modeling Method for Software Architecture

被引：0
作者：
Isa, M. A. [1 ]
Jawawi, Dayang N. A. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Syst, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia
来源：
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, PT 3 | 2011年 / 181卷
关键词：
Performance Assessment; Performance Model; Model Transformation; Software Performance Engineering; Model Driven Engineering; Unified Modeling Language (UML); Model Evaluation;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
Conducting performance assessment during the early phases of system development enhances early design decisions of system design. The generated performance models from system design will help in identifying the potential performance problems in the system design based on the result of the performance assessment. In recent years, several methods for performance assessment and modeling have been proposed. This paper presents the comparative evaluation of performance assessment and modeling methods to discover the strengths and weaknesses of the existing methods based on a set of criteria which includes process and modeling elements that was developed with the purpose to represent a specific process to assess the performance attributes with the help of modeling concepts. The four selected methods were evaluated based on these criterions and the results will hopefully guidance for developers to propose better methods for performance assessment and modeling in the future.
引用
收藏
页码：764 / 776
页数：13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Exploratory Modeling of Software Performance on Message-Oriented Middleware [J].
Flores-Gonzalez, Martin ;
Trejos-Zelaya, Ignacio ;
Garita, Cesar .
REVISTA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA, UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGOGICA Y TECNOLOGICA DE COLOMBIA, 2020, 29 (54)
[22]   Analysing Internet Software Retrieval Systems: Modeling and Performance Comparison [J].
José Merseguer ;
Javier Campos ;
Eduardo Mena .
Wireless Networks, 2003, 9 :223-238
[23]   Analysing Internet software retrieval systems: Modeling and performance comparison [J].
Merseguer, J ;
Campos, J ;
Mena, E .
WIRELESS NETWORKS, 2003, 9 (03) :223-238
[24]   The ProcessPAIR Method for Automated Software Process Performance Analysis [J].
Raza, Mushtaq ;
Faria, Joao Pascoal .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :141569-141583
[25]   Fuzzy modeling for performance assessment of irrigation systems [J].
Sewilam, HN ;
Rohde, FG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD CONGRESS OF COMPUTERS IN AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES, 2001, :826-834
[26]   Technical assessment and evaluation of environmental models and software: Letter to the Editor [J].
Alexandrov, G. A. ;
Ames, D. ;
Bellocchi, G. ;
Bruen, M. ;
Crout, N. ;
Erechtchoukova, M. ;
Hildebrandt, A. ;
Hoffman, F. ;
Jackisch, C. ;
Khaiter, P. ;
Mannina, G. ;
Matsunaga, T. ;
Purucker, S. T. ;
Rivington, M. ;
Samaniego, L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (03) :328-336
[27]   Performance assessment of an architecture with adaptative interfaces for people with special needs [J].
Gomez-Martinez, Elena ;
Gonzalez Cabero, Rafael ;
Merseguer, Jose .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (06) :1967-2018
[28]   Performance assessment of an architecture with adaptative interfaces for people with special needs [J].
Elena Gómez-Martínez ;
Rafael Gonzalez-Cabero ;
Jose Merseguer .
Empirical Software Engineering, 2014, 19 :1967-2018
[29]   Multicasting in interconnection networks: Modeling and performance evaluation [J].
Tutsch, D ;
Hommel, G .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING SYMPOSIUM - HPC '99, 1999, :413-424
[30]   Compositional layered performance modeling of peer-to-peer routing software [J].
Wu, PF ;
Woodside, M ;
Lung, CH .
CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE, COMPUTING, AND COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, 2004, :231-238
12345