Comparative Evaluation of Performance Assessment and Modeling Method for Software Architecture

被引：0

作者：

Isa, M. A. ^{[1
]}

Jawawi, Dayang N. A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Syst, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia

来源：

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, PT 3 | 2011年 / 181卷

关键词：

Performance Assessment; Performance Model; Model Transformation; Software Performance Engineering; Model Driven Engineering; Unified Modeling Language (UML); Model Evaluation;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

Conducting performance assessment during the early phases of system development enhances early design decisions of system design. The generated performance models from system design will help in identifying the potential performance problems in the system design based on the result of the performance assessment. In recent years, several methods for performance assessment and modeling have been proposed. This paper presents the comparative evaluation of performance assessment and modeling methods to discover the strengths and weaknesses of the existing methods based on a set of criteria which includes process and modeling elements that was developed with the purpose to represent a specific process to assess the performance attributes with the help of modeling concepts. The four selected methods were evaluated based on these criterions and the results will hopefully guidance for developers to propose better methods for performance assessment and modeling in the future.

引用

页码：764 / 776

页数：13

共 17 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2009, UML PROFILE MARTE MO

[2]

[Anonymous], 2001, ENG STRUCT, V31, DOI [10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.05.007, DOI 10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2009.05.007.(2001)]

[3]

Antoniou G., 2004, A semantic web primer

[4]

Asadi M., 2010, MODEL DRIVEN ARCHITE, P419

[5] A framework for classifying and comparing software architecture evaluation methods [J].

Babar, MA ;

Zhu, LM ;

Jeffery, R .

2004 AUSTRALIAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, :309-318

[6] Model-based performance prediction in software development: A survey [J].

Balsamo, S ;

Di Marco, A ;

Inverardi, P ;

Simeoni, M .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2004, 30 (05) :295-310

[7]

Downey A. B., 1999, Performance Evaluation Review, V26, P14, DOI 10.1145/309746.309750

[8]

Ho C.W., EVOLUTION

[9] DESMET: a methodology for evaluating software engineering methods and tools [J].

Kitchenham, B ;

Linkman, S ;

Law, D .

COMPUTING & CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1997, 8 (03) :120-126

[10]

Mohagheghi P., 2011, APPROACH EMPIRICAL E

← 1 2 →