Sampling Strategies for Fast Updating of Gaussian Markov Random Fields

被引:10
作者
Brown, D. Andrew [1 ]
McMahan, Christopher S. [1 ]
Self, Stella Watson [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Sch Math & Stat Sci, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Bayesian computation; Cholesky factorization; Chromatic Gibbs sampling; Conditional autoregressive model; Graph coloring; Markov chain Monte Carlo; CHAIN MONTE-CARLO; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; GIBBS SAMPLER; R PACKAGE; MODELS; DISTRIBUTIONS; RESTORATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/00031305.2019.1595144
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRFs) are popular for modeling dependence in large areal datasets due to their ease of interpretation and computational convenience afforded by the sparse precision matrices needed for random variable generation. Typically in Bayesian computation, GMRFs are updated jointly in a block Gibbs sampler or componentwise in a single-site sampler via the full conditional distributions. The former approach can speed convergence by updating correlated variables all at once, while the latter avoids solving large matrices. We consider a sampling approach in which the underlying graph can be cut so that conditionally independent sites are updated simultaneously. This algorithm allows a practitioner to parallelize updates of subsets of locations or to take advantage of "vectorized" calculations in a high-level language such as R. Through both simulated and real data, we demonstrate computational savings that can be achieved versus both single-site and block updating, regardless of whether the data are on a regular or an irregular lattice. The approach provides a good compromise between statistical and computational efficiency and is accessible to statisticians without expertise in numerical analysis or advanced computing.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 65
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Analysis of the Gibbs Sampler for Hierarchical Inverse Problems [J].
Agapiou, Sergios ;
Bardsley, Johnathan M. ;
Papaspiliopoulos, Omiros ;
Stuart, Andrew M. .
SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2014, 2 (01) :511-544
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, P C LEARN THEOR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis
[5]  
Banerjee Sudipto, 2015, Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data, Vsecond
[6]   MCMC-BASED IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION WITH UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION [J].
Bardsley, Johnathan M. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2012, 34 (03) :A1316-A1332
[7]  
Bates D., 2016, Matrix: Sparse and Dense Matrix Classes and Methods
[8]   A framework for validation of computer models [J].
Bayarri, Maria J. ;
Berger, James O. ;
Paulo, Rui ;
Sacks, Jerry ;
Cafeo, John A. ;
Cavendish, James ;
Lin, Chin-Hsu ;
Tu, Jian .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2007, 49 (02) :138-154
[9]  
BESAG J, 1974, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V36, P192
[10]   BAYESIAN IMAGE-RESTORATION, WITH 2 APPLICATIONS IN SPATIAL STATISTICS [J].
BESAG, J ;
YORK, J ;
MOLLIE, A .
ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 1991, 43 (01) :1-20