Body appendages fine-tune posture and moments in freely manoeuvring fruit flies

被引:18
作者
Berthe, Ruben [1 ]
Lehmann, Fritz-Olaf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Dept Anim Physiol, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
关键词
Aerodynamics; Body appendages; Drosophila; Free flight; Insect flight; Locomotion; Moment control; Moments of inertia; Posture stability; HOVERING INSECT FLIGHT; HAWKMOTH MANDUCA-SEXTA; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER; OPTOMOTOR CONTROL; GLIDING FLIGHT; YAW TORQUE; AERODYNAMICS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; ABDOMEN;
D O I
10.1242/jeb.122408
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The precise control of body posture by turning moments is key to elevated locomotor performance in flying animals. Although elevated moments for body stabilization are typically produced by wing aerodynamics, animals also steer using drag on body appendages, shifting their centre of body mass, and changing moments of inertia caused by active alterations in body shape. To estimate the instantaneous contribution of each of these components for posture control in an insect, we three-dimensionally reconstructed body posture and movements of body appendages in freely manoeuvring fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) by high-speed video and experimentally scored drag coefficients of legs and body trunk at low Reynolds number. The results show that the sum of leg- and abdomen-induced yaw moments dominates wing-induced moments during 17% of total flight time but is, on average, 7.2-times (roll, 3.4-times) smaller during manoeuvring. Our data reject a previous hypothesis on synergistic moment support, indicating that drag on body appendages and mass-shift inhibit rather than support turning moments produced by the wings. Numerical modelling further shows that hind leg extension alters the moments of inertia around the three main body axes of the animal by not more than 6% during manoeuvring, which is significantly less than previously reported for other insects. In sum, yaw, pitch and roll steering by body appendages probably fine-tune turning behaviour and body posture, without providing a significant advantage for posture stability and moment support. Motion control of appendages might thus be part of the insect's trimming reflexes, which reduce imbalances in moment generation caused by unilateral wing damage and abnormal asymmetries of the flight apparatus.
引用
收藏
页码:3295 / 3307
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   The aerodynamics of free-flight maneuvers in Drosophila [J].
Fry, SN ;
Sayaman, R ;
Dickinson, MH .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5618) :495-498
[22]  
Frye MA, 2001, J EXP BIOL, V204, P3683
[23]   OPTOMOTOR CONTROL OF WING BEAT AND BODY POSTURE IN DROSOPHILA [J].
GOTZ, KG ;
HENGSTENBERG, B ;
BIESINGER, R .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1979, 35 (02) :101-112
[24]   Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta:: the inverse problem of hovering [J].
Hedrick, T. L. ;
Daniel, T. L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 209 (16) :3114-3130
[25]   Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems [J].
Hedrick, Tyson L. .
BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS, 2008, 3 (03)
[26]   REAFFERENT CONTROL OF OPTOMOTOR YAW TORQUE IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
HEISENBERG, M ;
WOLF, R .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 163 (03) :373-388
[27]   ON THE FINE-STRUCTURE OF YAW TORQUE IN VISUAL FLIGHT ORIENTATION OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
HEISENBERG, M ;
WOLF, R .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 130 (02) :113-130
[28]   Turning behaviour depends on frictional damping in the fruit fly Drosophila [J].
Hesselberg, Thomas ;
Lehmann, Fritz-Olaf .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 210 (24) :4319-4334
[29]   The role of experience in flight behaviour of Drosophila [J].
Hesselberg, Thomas ;
Lehmann, Fritz-Olaf .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 212 (20) :3377-3386
[30]   Antennae in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) mediate abdominal flexion in response to mechanical stimuli [J].
Hinterwirth, Armin J. ;
Daniel, Thomas L. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 196 (12) :947-956