The mobility turn: a new paradigm for the social sciences?

被引:211
作者
Faist, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, Fac Sociol, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
mobility; migration; welfare state; transnationality; social inequality; sedentarism; STATE;
D O I
10.1080/01419870.2013.812229
中图分类号
C95 [民族学、文化人类学];
学科分类号
0304 ; 030401 ;
摘要
A new paradigmatic turn has reached migration studies, the mobility turn. Following on from many turns in the recent past, such as the linguistic turn, the cultural turn and the spatial turn, the mobility turn seems to be the newest effort in diagnostic descriptions of modern society. Like other turns, the mobility turn generalizes one aspect of contemporary society to the detriment of other features. While such a turn may usefully highlight various forms of spatial mobility, it cannot be fruitfully employed unless the scholars working with this paradigm critically reflect underlying political assumptions about the nexus between spatial and social mobility. Moreover, any analysis of spatial and social mobilities needs to go beyond descriptions and start accounting for the mechanisms underlying the production of social inequalities.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1646
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, HAS GLOBALIZATION GO
[2]  
[Anonymous], FEAR ANXIETY NATL ID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MIGR INT WORLD NEW D
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The Rise of the Network Society
[5]  
Bauman Zygmunt., 1998, GLOBALIZATION HUMAN
[6]  
Beck U., 2008, Die Neuvermessung der Ungleichheit unter den Menschen
[7]  
Beck U., 1999, World Risk Society.
[8]   Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization [J].
Cerny, PG .
GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 1997, 32 (02) :251-274
[9]  
de Swaan Abram., 1988, In Care of the State: Health Care, Education, and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era
[10]  
Diewald M, 2011, HETEROGENEITIES INEQ