A review of animal welfare implications of the Canadian commercial seal hunt

被引:13
作者
Butterworth, Andrew [1 ]
Richardson, Mary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Langford BS40 5DU, N Somerset, England
关键词
Seal hunt; Animal welfare; Marine mammal regulations; Harp seal; Phoca groenlandica; Post-mortem; HARP SEALS; OXYGEN STORES; MARKSMANSHIP; METABOLISM; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2012.07.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Canadian seal hunt is the world's largest commercial slaughter of marine mammals and, as such, has been the subject of veterinary scrutiny for half a century. In that time, veterinary experts have made multiple recommendations to improve welfare at the seal hunt, some of which have been included in Canadian sealing regulations. Yet analysis of video material and studies on the outcomes of the hunt suggest that the potential for suffering during the hunt continues, and may, in fact, be increasing. In the past decade, numerous countries have taken action to prohibit their trade in products of commercial seal hunts in response to public concerns about the welfare of the seals. With these actions now being examined at the World Trade Organization, it is important to determine if these concerns are warranted. This paper reviews relevant veterinary science, exploring the intrinsic elements of commercial sealing and unique physical adaptations of seals that prevent effective and consistent application of humane slaughter methods at the seal hunt. The review of available data indicates that generally accepted principles of humane slaughter cannot be carried out effectively or consistently in the commercial seal hunt. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 469
页数:13
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
American Veterinary Medical Association, 2007, GUID EUTH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FISH VESS SAF REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Scientific report of the scientific panel for animal health and welfare on request from the commission related to welfare aspects of the castration of piglets European food safety authority AHAW/04-087
[4]  
[Anonymous], REP WELF FARM AN S 1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN
[6]  
ASKEW EW, 1989, PHYSICIAN SPORTSMED, V17, P77
[7]  
Barcroft J, 1927, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V64, P1
[8]  
Barry D, 2010, SUDBURY STAR
[9]  
Bass D, 2005, SAFER FISHING VESSEL
[10]  
Burdon R. L., 2001, VET REPORT CANADIAN