Investigating which behaviour change techniques work for whom in which contexts delivered by what means: Proposal for an international collaboratory of Centres for Understanding Behaviour Change (CUBiC)

被引:18
作者
Armitage, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
Conner, Mark [3 ]
Prestwich, Andrew [3 ]
de Bruin, Marijn [4 ]
Johnston, Marie [5 ]
Sniehotta, Falko [6 ]
Epton, Tracy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
[6] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
behaviour change; interventions; meta-analysis; methods; systematic review; taxonomy; techniques; SELF-AFFIRMATION; HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; CONSENSUS; TAXONOMY;
D O I
10.1111/bjhp.12479
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose Behaviour change techniques are fundamental to the development of any behaviour change intervention, but surprisingly little is known about their properties. Key questions include when, why, how, in which contexts, for which behaviours, in what combinations, compared with what, and for whom behaviour change techniques are typically effective. The aims of the present paper are to: (1) articulate the scope of the challenge in understanding the properties of behaviour change techniques, (2) propose means by which to tackle this problem, and (3) call scientists to action. Methods Iterative consensus (O'Connor et al., 2020,Br. J. Psychol., e12468) was used to elicit and distil the judgements of experts on how best to tackle the problem of understanding the nature and operation of behaviour change techniques. Results We propose a worldwide network of 'Centres for Understanding Behaviour Change' (CUBiC) simultaneously undertaking research to establish what are the single and combined properties of behaviour change techniques across multiple behaviours and populations. We additionally provide a first attempt to systematize an approach that CUBiC could use to understand behaviour change techniques and to begin to harness the efforts of researchers worldwide. Conclusion Better understanding of behaviour change techniques is vital for improving behaviour change interventions to tackle global problems such as obesity and recovery from COVID-19. The CUBiC proposal is just one of many possible solutions to the problems that the world faces and is a call to action for scientists to work collaboratively to gain deeper understanding of the underpinnings of behaviour change interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, HUMAN BEHAV CHANGE P
[2]   Sports nutrition interventions: A systematic review of behavioural strategies used to promote dietary behaviour change in athletes [J].
Bentley, Meghan R. N. ;
Mitchell, Nigel ;
Backhouse, Susan H. .
APPETITE, 2020, 150
[3]   Variability and effectiveness of comparator group interventions in smoking cessation trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Black, Nicola ;
Eisma, Maarten C. ;
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang ;
Johnston, Marie ;
West, Robert ;
Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie ;
Michie, Susan ;
de Bruin, Marijn .
ADDICTION, 2020, 115 (09) :1607-1617
[4]   Self-Incentives Uniquely Boost Cessation in Community-Based Stop Smoking Programs: Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Brown, Emma M. ;
Smith, Debbie M. ;
Armitage, Christopher J. .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 (05) :442-452
[5]   Do Self-Incentives and Self-Rewards Change Behavior? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Brown, Emma M. ;
Smith, Debbie M. ;
Epton, Tracy ;
Armitage, Christopher J. .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2018, 49 (01) :113-123
[6]   Unique Effects of Setting Goals on Behavior Change: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Epton, Tracy ;
Currie, Sinead ;
Armitage, Christopher J. .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 85 (12) :1182-1198
[7]   The Impact of Self-Affirmation on Health-Behavior Change: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Epton, Tracy ;
Harris, Peter R. ;
Kane, Rachel ;
van Koningsbruggen, Guido M. ;
Sheeran, Paschal .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 34 (03) :187-196
[8]   Does Monitoring Goal Progress Promote Goal Attainment? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence [J].
Harkin, Benjamin ;
Webb, Thomas L. ;
Chang, Betty P. I. ;
Prestwich, Andrew ;
Conner, Mark ;
Kellar, Ian ;
Benn, Yael ;
Sheeran, Paschal .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2016, 142 (02) :198-229
[9]   The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Hollands, Gareth J. ;
French, David P. ;
Griffin, Simon J. ;
Prevost, A. Toby ;
Sutton, Stephen ;
King, Sarah ;
Marteau, Theresa M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
[10]   A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach [J].
Kok, Gerjo ;
Gottlieb, Nell H. ;
Peters, Gjalt-Jorn Y. ;
Mullen, Patricia Dolan ;
Parcel, Guy S. ;
Ruiter, Robert A. C. ;
Fernandez, Maria E. ;
Markham, Christine ;
Bartholomew, L. Kay .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 10 (03) :297-312