Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

被引:20
作者
Sharma, Garima [1 ]
Chiva-Razavi, Sima [2 ]
Viriato, Daniel [2 ]
Naujoks, Christel [2 ]
Patalano, Francesco [2 ]
Bentley, Sarah [3 ]
Findley, Amy [3 ]
Johnson, Chloe [3 ]
Arbuckle, Rob [3 ]
Wolffsohn, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Adelphi Values Patient Ctr Outcomes, Bollington, England
[4] Aston Univ, Optometry, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VISION IMPAIRMENT; REFRACTIVE STATUS; RASCH; LENS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Childhood Cancer
    Horan, Madeline R.
    Sim, Jin-ah
    Krull, Kevin R.
    Baker, Justin N.
    Huang, I-Chan
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2022, 9 (10):
  • [42] Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures, measuring fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis, a systematic review
    Ruzzi, Miguel Angel Jorquera
    Coll, Marti Boix
    Mata, Maria Jose Dura
    Tello, Maria Cristina Ramo
    Garcia, Irma Casas
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2024, 92
  • [43] Use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Pediatric Orthopaedic Literature
    Phillips, Lisa
    Carsen, Sasha
    Vasireddi, Anisha
    Mulpuri, Kishore
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 38 (08) : 393 - 397
  • [44] Usage Trends of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Shoulder Literature
    Mosher, Zachary A.
    Ewing, Michael A.
    Collins, Christine S.
    Young, Patrick G.
    Brabston, Eugene W.
    Momaya, Amit M.
    Tashjian, Robert Z.
    Ponce, Brent A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (17) : E774 - E781
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Schoch, Dominic
    Sommer, Rachel
    Augustin, Matthias
    Staender, Sonja
    Blome, Christine
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 137 (10) : 2069 - 2077
  • [46] Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review
    Wee, Priscilla Jia Ling
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Loh, Dionne Hui Fang
    Phang, Jie Kie
    Puar, Troy H.
    Ostbye, Truls
    Thumboo, Julian
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Low, Lian Leng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)
  • [47] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW AND MAPPING EXERCISE
    Shayestehpour, Shiva
    Sharma, Karan
    Mosor, Erika
    Omara, Maisa
    Ritschl, Valentin
    Shayestehpour, Shima
    Stamm, Tanja
    Bekes, Katrin
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [48] REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR USE IN MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY TYPE 1 PATIENTS
    Symonds, Tara
    Randall, Jason A.
    Campbell, Patrick
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2017, 56 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [49] Patient-reported outcome measures for use in clinical trials of SLE: a review
    Izadi, Zara
    Gandrup, Julie
    Katz, Patricia P.
    Yazdany, Jinoos
    LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2018, 5 (01):
  • [50] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis
    Ratnayake, Irushi
    Ahern, Susannah
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):