Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

被引:20
|
作者
Sharma, Garima [1 ]
Chiva-Razavi, Sima [2 ]
Viriato, Daniel [2 ]
Naujoks, Christel [2 ]
Patalano, Francesco [2 ]
Bentley, Sarah [3 ]
Findley, Amy [3 ]
Johnson, Chloe [3 ]
Arbuckle, Rob [3 ]
Wolffsohn, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Adelphi Values Patient Ctr Outcomes, Bollington, England
[4] Aston Univ, Optometry, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VISION IMPAIRMENT; REFRACTIVE STATUS; RASCH; LENS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review
    Ben Bouazza, Youssef
    Chiairi, Ibrahim
    El Kharbouchi, Ouiam
    De Backer, Lesley
    Vanhoutte, Greetje
    Janssens, Annelies
    Van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2017, 113 : 140 - 151
  • [32] A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with skin cancer, 2013
    Gibbons, E.
    Casanas i Comabella, C.
    Fitzpatrick, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 168 (06) : 1176 - 1186
  • [33] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review
    Houston, Megan N.
    Hoch, Johanna M.
    Hoch, Matthew C.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2015, 50 (10) : 1019 - 1033
  • [34] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hyperhidrosis: a systematic review
    Gabes, Michaela
    Knuettel, Helge
    Kann, Gesina
    Tischer, Christina
    Apfelbacher, Christian J.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (03) : 671 - 686
  • [35] Patient-reported outcome measures in subarachnoid hemorrhage A systematic review
    Nobels-Janssen, Edith
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Verhagen, Wim I. M.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Bartels, Ronald H. M. A.
    Boogaarts, Jeroen D.
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (23) : 1096 - 1112
  • [36] Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Perez-Panero, Alberto J.
    Ruiz-Munoz, Maria
    Fernandez-Torres, Raul
    Formosa, Cynthia
    Gatt, Alfred
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (12) : 3395 - 3405
  • [37] Patient-reported outcome measures for life participation in kidney transplantation: A systematic review
    Ju, Angela
    Chow, Bi Yang
    Ralph, Angelique F.
    Howell, Martin
    Josephson, Michelle A.
    Ahn, Curie
    Butt, Zeeshan
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    Fowler, Kevin
    Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila
    Jha, Vivekanand
    Locke, Jayme E.
    Tan, Jane C.
    Taylor, Quinetta
    Rutherford, Claudia
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Tong, Allison
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 (08) : 2306 - 2317
  • [38] The importance of patient-reported outcome measures in reconstructive urology
    Jackson, Matthew J.
    N'Dow, James
    Pickard, Rob
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (06) : 495 - 499
  • [39] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Vedadi, Ali
    Khairalla, Roula
    Che, Adrian
    Nagee, Ahsas
    Saqib, Mohammed
    Ayub, Ali
    Wasim, Aghna
    Macanovic, Sara
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Selzner-Malekkiani, Nazia
    Bartlett, Susan
    Mucsi, Istvan
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (09) : 2435 - 2445
  • [40] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Ali Vedadi
    Roula Khairalla
    Adrian Che
    Ahsas Nagee
    Mohammed Saqib
    Ali Ayub
    Aghna Wasim
    Sara Macanovic
    Ani Orchanian-Cheff
    Nazia Selzner-Malekkiani
    Susan Bartlett
    Istvan Mucsi
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2435 - 2445