Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

被引:20
|
作者
Sharma, Garima [1 ]
Chiva-Razavi, Sima [2 ]
Viriato, Daniel [2 ]
Naujoks, Christel [2 ]
Patalano, Francesco [2 ]
Bentley, Sarah [3 ]
Findley, Amy [3 ]
Johnson, Chloe [3 ]
Arbuckle, Rob [3 ]
Wolffsohn, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Adelphi Values Patient Ctr Outcomes, Bollington, England
[4] Aston Univ, Optometry, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VISION IMPAIRMENT; REFRACTIVE STATUS; RASCH; LENS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neurosurgery: A Review of the Current Literature (vol 81, 2017)
    Ghimire, Prajwal
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 82 (05) : 750 - 750
  • [32] SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES USED IN MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA
    Miu, K.
    Challagulla, S.
    Arthur, D.
    Neuenburg, J. K.
    Iyengar, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S76 - S76
  • [33] The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the literature on traumatic foot fractures: A systematic review
    Berk, Thirza A.
    Smeeing, Diederik P. J.
    van der Vliet, Quirine M. J.
    Leenen, Luke P. H.
    Hietbrink, Falco
    van Baal, Mark C. P. M.
    Houwert, Roderick M.
    Heng, Marilyn
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2022, 53 (06): : 2366 - 2372
  • [34] Engaging Patients as Partners in Developing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer—A Review of the Literature
    Natasha Camuso
    Prerna Bajaj
    Deborah Dudgeon
    Gunita Mitera
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 3543 - 3549
  • [35] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Ferreira Junior, Alexandre Soares
    Lessa, Morgana Pinheiro Maux
    Kaplan, Samantha
    Coles, Theresa M.
    Terrell, Deirdra R.
    Onwuemene, Oluwatoyosi A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (15)
  • [36] Considerations for selecting patient-reported outcome measures for peritoneal dialysis patients: A review of the literature
    Shephard, Deanna
    Tan, Ken-Soon
    Lewis, Amanda
    RENAL SOCIETY OF AUSTRALASIA JOURNAL, 2023, 19 (02) : 118 - 122
  • [37] Patient-reported outcome measures for hip preservation surgery-a systematic review of the literature
    Ramisetty, N.
    Kwon, Y.
    Mohtadi, N.
    JOURNAL OF HIP PRESERVATION SURGERY, 2015, 2 (01): : 15 - 27
  • [38] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OCULAR SURFACE PAIN : A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Sharma, G.
    Naujoks, C.
    Sloesen, B.
    Goswami, P.
    Patalano, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S732 - S732
  • [39] Literature review to assemble the evidence for response scales used in patient-reported outcome measures
    Gries K.
    Berry P.
    Harrington M.
    Crescioni M.
    Patel M.
    Rudell K.
    Safikhani S.
    Pease S.
    Vernon M.
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2 (1)
  • [40] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Wiering, Bianca
    de Boer, Dolf
    Delnoij, Diana
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) : 11 - 23