Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

被引:20
|
作者
Sharma, Garima [1 ]
Chiva-Razavi, Sima [2 ]
Viriato, Daniel [2 ]
Naujoks, Christel [2 ]
Patalano, Francesco [2 ]
Bentley, Sarah [3 ]
Findley, Amy [3 ]
Johnson, Chloe [3 ]
Arbuckle, Rob [3 ]
Wolffsohn, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Adelphi Values Patient Ctr Outcomes, Bollington, England
[4] Aston Univ, Optometry, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VISION IMPAIRMENT; REFRACTIVE STATUS; RASCH; LENS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Barello, Serena
    Anderson, Gloria
    Bosio, Caterina
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Leo, Donato G.
    Lobban, Trudie C. A.
    Trevisan, Caterina
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [22] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Endometriosis
    Nicolas-Boluda, Alba
    Oppenheimer, Anne
    Bouaziz, Jerome
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [23] Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery: A systematic review
    Beighley, Adam
    Zhang, Allen
    Huang, Brendan
    Carr, Christopher
    Mathkour, Mansour
    Werner, Cassidy
    Scullen, Tyler
    Kilgore, Mitchell D.
    Maulucci, Christopher M.
    Dallapiazza, Robert F.
    Kalyvas, James
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2022, 13 (04) : 378 - 389
  • [24] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Scoping Review
    Voet, Nicoline
    Pater, Ronne
    Garmendia, Joana
    Sistiaga, Andone
    Labayru, Garazi
    Gallais, Benjamin
    de Groot, Ingrid
    Muslemani, Samar
    Gagnon, Cynthia
    Graham, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 11 (03) : 567 - 577
  • [25] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Mohs Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Garg, Neha
    Mandloi, Shreya
    Queenan, Natalia
    Trivedi, Jay
    Mccann, Adam
    Xu, Vivian
    Amin, Dev
    Krein, Howard
    Heffelfinger, Ryan
    OTO OPEN, 2024, 8 (04)
  • [26] A Review of HIV-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Engler, Kim
    Lessard, David
    Lebouche, Bertrand
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2017, 10 (02) : 187 - 202
  • [27] Patient-reported outcome measures in vitreoretinal surgery: a systematic review
    Yoganathan, Anusha
    Sandinha, Teresa
    Shamdas, Mohith
    Diafas, Asterios
    Steel, David
    EYE, 2023, 37 (03) : 391 - 401
  • [28] Assessing the impact of headaches and the outcomes of treatment: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    Haywood, Kirstie L.
    Mars, Tom S.
    Potter, Rachel
    Patel, Shilpa
    Matharu, Manjit
    Underwood, Martin
    CEPHALALGIA, 2018, 38 (07) : 1374 - 1386
  • [29] Patient-reported outcome measures in oral lichen planus: A comprehensive review of the literature with focus on psychometric properties and interpretability
    Wiriyakijja, Paswach
    Fedele, Stefano
    Porter, Stephen R.
    Mercadante, Valeria
    Ni Riordain, Richeal
    JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2018, 47 (03) : 228 - 239
  • [30] Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pruritus: An Updated Systematic Review
    Topp, Janine
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    Stander, Sonja
    Augustin, Matthias
    Blome, Christine
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 142 (02) : 343 - 354