Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

被引:20
|
作者
Sharma, Garima [1 ]
Chiva-Razavi, Sima [2 ]
Viriato, Daniel [2 ]
Naujoks, Christel [2 ]
Patalano, Francesco [2 ]
Bentley, Sarah [3 ]
Findley, Amy [3 ]
Johnson, Chloe [3 ]
Arbuckle, Rob [3 ]
Wolffsohn, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Adelphi Values Patient Ctr Outcomes, Bollington, England
[4] Aston Univ, Optometry, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VISION IMPAIRMENT; REFRACTIVE STATUS; RASCH; LENS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Allison Worth
    Victoria Hammersley
    Rebecca Knibb
    Bertine Flokstra-de-Blok
    Audrey DunnGalvin
    Samantha Walker
    Anthony E J Dubois
    Aziz Sheikh
    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 24
  • [22] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Janic, Ana
    Bowden, Sylvie
    Levy, Sarah
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Dimaras, Helen
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [23] REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR DAYTIME FUNCTIONING
    Choi, J. C.
    Joish, V. N.
    Suh, D. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A372 - A372
  • [24] A review of patient-reported outcome measures used in uveitis
    Senthil, Mallika Prem
    Simon, Sumu
    Constable, Paul A.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 68 (02) : 225 - 240
  • [25] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Ana Janic
    Sylvie Bowden
    Sarah Levy
    Jennifer Stinson
    Helen Dimaras
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4
  • [26] Individualised patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review
    Gangannagaripalli, Jaheeda
    Porter, Ian
    Bradley, Daniela G.
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    Valderas, Jose M.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [27] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [29] Usage Trends of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Shoulder Literature
    Mosher, Zachary A.
    Ewing, Michael A.
    Collins, Christine S.
    Young, Patrick G.
    Brabston, Eugene W.
    Momaya, Amit M.
    Tashjian, Robert Z.
    Ponce, Brent A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (17) : E774 - E781
  • [30] Use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Pediatric Orthopaedic Literature
    Phillips, Lisa
    Carsen, Sasha
    Vasireddi, Anisha
    Mulpuri, Kishore
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 38 (08) : 393 - 397