Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

被引:20
|
作者
Sharma, Garima [1 ]
Chiva-Razavi, Sima [2 ]
Viriato, Daniel [2 ]
Naujoks, Christel [2 ]
Patalano, Francesco [2 ]
Bentley, Sarah [3 ]
Findley, Amy [3 ]
Johnson, Chloe [3 ]
Arbuckle, Rob [3 ]
Wolffsohn, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Healthcare, Hyderabad, India
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Adelphi Values Patient Ctr Outcomes, Bollington, England
[4] Aston Univ, Optometry, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VISION IMPAIRMENT; REFRACTIVE STATUS; RASCH; LENS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Angioedema: A Literature Review
    Brix, Anna Trier Heiberg
    Boysen, Henrik Balle
    Weller, Karsten
    Caballero, Teresa
    Bygum, Anette
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [2] Patient-reported outcome measures in hallux valgus surgery. A review of literature
    Schrier, Joost C. M.
    Palmen, Leonieke N.
    Verheyen, Cees C. P. M.
    Jansen, Justus
    Koeter, Sander
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2015, 21 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [3] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Review of the Literature
    Taimeh, Dina
    Ni Riordain, Richeal
    Fedele, Stefano
    Leeson, Rachel
    JOURNAL OF ORAL & FACIAL PAIN AND HEADACHE, 2023, 37 (02) : 113 - 129
  • [4] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome measures for use in gynaecological oncology: a systematic review
    Preston, N. J.
    Wilson, N.
    Wood, N. J.
    Brine, J.
    Ferreira, J.
    Brearley, S. G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (05) : 615 - 622
  • [6] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR ADULT DENTAL PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Mittal, Hina
    John, Mike T.
    Sekulic, Stella
    Theis-Mahon, Nicole
    Rener-Sitar, Ksenija
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (01) : 53 - 70
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neurosurgery: A Review of the Current Literature
    Ghimire, Prajwal
    Hasegawa, Harutomo
    Kalyal, Nida
    Hurwitz, Victoria
    Ashkan, Keyoumars
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (04) : 622 - 630
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures in depression
    a Steig, David Husdal
    Reinholt, Nina
    Christensen, Anne Bryde
    Hvenegaard Pedersen, Morten
    Arnfred, Sidse Marie
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 77 (02) : 212 - 219
  • [9] A review of patient-reported outcome measures used in uveitis
    Senthil, Mallika Prem
    Simon, Sumu
    Constable, Paul A.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 68 (02) : 225 - 240
  • [10] Letter: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neurosurgery: A Review of the Current Literature
    Schiavolin, Silvia
    Broggi, Morgan
    Ferroli, Paolo
    Leonardi, Matilde
    Raggi, Alberto
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (01) : E54 - E55