A risk prediction model for colorectal cancer using genome-wide association study-identified polymorphisms and established risk factors among Japanese: results from two independent case-control studies

被引:15
|
作者
Hosono, Satoyo [1 ]
Ito, Hidemi [1 ,5 ]
Oze, Isao [1 ]
Watanabe, Miki [1 ]
Komori, Koji [3 ]
Yatabe, Yasushi [4 ]
Shimizu, Yasuhiro [3 ]
Tanaka, Hideo [1 ,5 ]
Matsuo, Keitaro [2 ]
机构
[1] Aichi Canc Ctr Res Inst, Div Epidemiol & Prevent, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Aichi Canc Ctr Res Inst, Div Mol Med, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[4] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Pathol & Mol Diagnost, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[5] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
case-control studies; colorectal cancer; genetic polymorphism; genome-wide association study; Japanese; risk assessment; FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE; COLON-CANCER; GENERAL-POPULATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MORTALITY; LOCUS; SMAD7;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000213
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Most genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer (CRC) carried out to date have been in populations with European ancestry, and the extent to which the identified variants contribute as predictors of CRC among Japanese populations has not been clarified. We analyzed 23 genetic variants identified in previous genome-wide association studies in a derivation case-control study with 558 cases and 1116 age-matched and sex-matched controls. Six single nucleotide polymorphisms were selected for synthesis of the genetic risk score. A dose-dependent association was observed between CRC risk and genetic risk score, which is the aggregate number of alleles in six selected variants: 8q24 - rs6983267, 15q13 - rs4779584 and rs1696961, 14q22 - rs444435, 16q22 - rs9929218, and 3q26.2 - rs1093599. The c statistic for a model that included the genetic risk score and conventional risk factors was 0.7167, versus 0.7009 with the conventional risk factors only (P=0.0013). This model was evaluated in a replication study with 547 cases and 547 age-matched and sex-matched controls, and the corresponding c statistics were 0.6356 and 0.6391 with no statistical significance. When the two studies were combined, the corresponding c statistics were 0.6132 and 0.6198 (P=0.0126). We developed a risk model that incorporates a genetic risk score and established risk factors, but this model was not satisfactory in the replication study. The results in the combined study still encourage further attempts using a similar approach among individual countries.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 507
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Repeat polymorphisms in ESR2 and ARand colorectal cancer risk and prognosis: results from a German population-based case-control study
    Anja Rudolph
    Hong Shi
    Asta Försti
    Michael Hoffmeister
    Juan Sainz
    Lina Jansen
    Kari Hemminki
    Hermann Brenner
    Jenny Chang-Claude
    BMC Cancer, 14
  • [32] Type 2 Diabetes, Antidiabetic Medications, and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Two Case-Control Studies from Italy and Spain
    Rosato, Valentina
    Tavani, Alessandra
    Gracia-Lavedan, Esther
    Guino, Elisabet
    Castano-Vinyals, Gemma
    Villanueva, Cristina M.
    Kogevinas, Manolis
    Polesel, Jerry
    Serraino, Diego
    Pisa, Federica E.
    Barbone, Fabio
    Moreno, Victor
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Bosetti, Cristina
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6
  • [33] Predictive model for risk of gastric cancer using genetic variants from genome-wide association studies and high-evidence meta-analysis
    Qiu, Lixin
    Qu, Xiaofei
    He, Jing
    Cheng, Lei
    Zhang, Ruoxin
    Sun, Menghong
    Yang, Yajun
    Wang, Jiucun
    Wang, Mengyun
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Guo, Weijian
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (19): : 7310 - 7316
  • [34] Risk factors for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: Results from a Swedish case-control study
    Riman, T
    Dickman, PW
    Nilsson, S
    Correia, N
    Nordlinder, H
    Magnusson, CM
    Persson, IR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 156 (04) : 363 - 373
  • [35] Risk Factors for Ovarian Cancer: Results from a Hospital-Based Case-Control Study
    Reis, Nesrin
    Beji, Nezihe Kizilkaya
    TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2010, 30 (01): : 79 - 87
  • [36] Dietary Patterns and Lifestyle Factors Associated with the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study among Malaysians
    Yee, Lim Sook
    Ulaganathan, Vaidehi
    Nallamuthu, Padmini
    Gunasekaran, Baskaran
    Salvamani, Shamala
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 31 (01): : 212 - 234
  • [37] Polymorphisms of genes coding for ghrelin and its receptor in relation to colorectal cancer risk: a two-step gene-wide case-control study
    Campa, Daniele
    Pardini, Barbara
    Naccarati, Alessio
    Vodickova, Ludmila
    Novotny, Jan
    Steinke, Verena
    Rahner, Nils
    Holinski-Feder, Elke
    Morak, Monika
    Schackert, Hans K.
    Goergens, Heike
    Koetting, Judith
    Betz, Beate
    Kloor, Matthias
    Engel, Christoph
    Buettner, Reinhard
    Propping, Peter
    Foersti, Asta
    Hemminki, Kari
    Barale, Roberto
    Vodicka, Pavel
    Canzian, Federico
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 10
  • [38] Association between XRCC1 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 23 case-control studies
    Liu, Li
    Miao, Lin
    Ji, Guozhong
    Qiang, Fulin
    Liu, Zheng
    Fan, Zhining
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 40 (06) : 3943 - 3952
  • [39] Association of XPC Gene Polymorphisms with Colorectal Cancer Risk in a Southern Chinese Population: A Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis
    Hua, Rui-Xi
    Zhu, Jinhong
    Jiang, Dan-Hua
    Zhang, Shao-Dan
    Zhang, Jiang-Bo
    Xue, Wen-Qiong
    Li, Xi-Zhao
    Zhang, Pei-Fen
    He, Jing
    Jia, Wei-Hua
    GENES, 2016, 7 (10)
  • [40] Exposures in painting-related occupations and risk of lung cancer among men: results from two case-control studies in Montreal
    Ramanakumar, Agnihotram V.
    Parent, Marie-Elise
    Richardson, Lesley
    Siemiatycki, Jack
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2011, 68 (01) : 44 - 51