Validity Evidence of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (ICM Jr) for Use in Brazil

被引：1

作者：

Teotonio, Geisiele de Souza ^{[1
]}

Cavalcanti de Sousa, Geida Maria ^{[2
]}

Sampaio, Leonardo Rodrigues ^{[2
]}

Formiga, Nilton Soares ^{[3
]}

Oliveira Teotonio, Geazi Rosa ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Escola Manoel Nunes Barbosa, Povoado Poco Cruz S-N, Petrolina, Brazil

[2] Univ Fed Vale Sao Francisco UNIVASF, Av Jose de Sa Manicoba S-N, BR-56304970 Ctr Petrolina, PE, Brazil

[3] Univ Potiguar, Rua Francisco Brandao 973, BR-58038520 Joao Pessoa, PB, Brazil

[4] Univ Fed Vale Sao Francisco, Educ, UNIVASF Rodovia BR 407,Km 12,Lote 543, Ctr Petrolina, Brazil

来源：

REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE DIAGNOSTICO Y EVALUACION-E AVALIACAO PSICOLOGICA | 2019年 / 2卷 / 51期

关键词：

metacognition; adaptation; factorial validity; adolescents; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE; SKILLS;

D O I：

10.21865/RIDEP51.2.14

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

The aim of the current research was to translate, to adapt and to validate the Metacognitive Consciousness Inventory (ICM-Jr), by Sperling, Howard, Miller, and Murphy (2002), for its use in Brazil. 698 students enrolled in middle and high school levels, in the cities of Juazeiro-BA and Petrolina-PE, composed the samples of two studies. In the first study, validity evidences of the translated and adapted version of that instrument were found, suggesting its adequacy for evaluation of metacognition in Brazilian adolescents. Analyzes regarding the dimensionality of the scale corroborated the two-factor model of Sperling et al. (2002), composed by the factors "Knowledge of cognition" and "Regulation of cognition". Finally, 15- to 16-year-old in High School scored higher than those in the Middle School. The results are discussed in the light of recent studies on metacognition and considering the socio-educational reality where the research took place.

引用

页码：181 / 195

页数：15

共 10 条

[1] The Bifactor Model of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Jr. MAI)
Ning, Hoi Kwan
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 38 (02) : 367 - 375
[2] The Bifactor Model of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Jr. MAI)
Hoi Kwan Ning
Current Psychology, 2019, 38 : 367 - 375
[3] Turkish Version of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory: The Validation Study
Aydin, Utkun
Ubuz, Behiye
EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2010, 35 (157): : 30 - 45
[4] A Rasch Analysis of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory With Singapore Students
Ning, Hoi Kwan
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 51 (02) : 84 - 91
[5] Establishing the Factor Structure of the 18-Item Version of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory
Kim, Boyoung
Zyromski, Brett
Mariani, Melissa
Lee, Sang Min
Carey, John C.
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 50 (1-2) : 48 - 57
[6] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of revised metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory
Borekci, Rabia
Borekci, Caner
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 10 (02): : 331 - 344
[7] Analysis of the Structural Validity of the Reduced Version of Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory
Onde, Daniel
Jimenez, Virginia
Alvarado, Jesus M.
Gracia, Marta
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
[8] EVIDENCE OF VALIDITY OF THE CHILDREN'S VERSION OF THE GROWING DISCIPLES INVENTORY (GDI) FOR USE IN PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE BRAZIL
Viana, Helena Brandao
de Oliveira Guimaraes, Roberta Rodrigues
REVISTA IBERO-AMERICANA DE ESTUDOS EM EDUCACAO, 2022, 17 (01): : 182 - 196
[9] Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence
Harrison, George M.
Vallin, Lisa M.
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2018, 13 (01) : 15 - 38
[10] Quality of Communication Questionnaire for Hospitalized Patients Hospitalized in Intensive and Palliative Care Unit: Validity Evidence for Use in Brazil
Del Castanhel, Flavia
Burg, Luciana
Nogueira, Leonardo Maia
de Oliveira Filho, Getulio Rodrigues
Grosseman, Suely
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (05) : 535 - 541

← 1 →