The Role of Eelgrass in Marine Community Interactions and Ecosystem Services: Results from Ecosystem-Scale Food Web Models

被引:42
作者
Plummer, Mark L. [1 ]
Harvey, Chris J. [1 ]
Anderson, Leif E. [3 ]
Guerry, Anne D. [2 ]
Ruckelshaus, Mary H. [2 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Conservat Biol Div, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Nat Capital Project, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] NOAA, Fishery Resource Anal & Monitoring Div, NW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
关键词
ecosystem services; habitat restoration; eelgrass restoration; ecosystem models; food webs; economics; ECOPATH; CONSERVATION; ECOSIM; OCEAN;
D O I
10.1007/s10021-012-9609-0
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Eelgrass beds provide valuable refuge, foraging, and spawning habitat for many marine species, including valued species such as Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi), and Dungeness crab (Metacarcinus magister). We used dynamic simulations in a food web model of central Puget Sound, Washington, USA developed in the Ecopath with Ecosim software, to examine how the marine community may respond to changes in coverage of native eelgrass (Zostera marina), and how these modeled responses can be assessed using an ecosystem services framework, expressing these services with economic currencies in some cases and biological proxies in others. Increased eelgrass coverage was most associated with increases in commercial and recreational fishing with some small decreases in one non-market activity, bird watching. When we considered ecosystem service categories that are aggregations of individual groups of species, we saw little evidence of strong tradeoffs among marine resources; that is, increasing eelgrass coverage was essentially either positive or neutral for all services we examined, although we did not examine terrestrial activities (for example, land use) that affect eelgrass coverage. Within particular service categories, however, we found cases where the responses to changes in eelgrass of individual groups of species that provide the same type of ecosystem service differed both in the magnitude and in the direction of change. This emphasizes the care that should be taken in combining multiple examples of a particular type of ecosystem service into an aggregate measure of that service.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 251
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Anielski M, 2009, COUNTING CANADAS NAT, P78
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decisionmaking
  • [3] [Anonymous], 477 UN FAO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING WE
  • [5] Economic valuation for the conservation of marine biodiversity
    Beaumont, N. J.
    Austen, M. C.
    Mangi, S. C.
    Townsend, M.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2008, 56 (03) : 386 - 396
  • [6] On measuring economic values for nature
    Bockstael, NE
    Freeman, AM
    Kopp, RJ
    Portney, PR
    Smith, VK
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) : 1384 - 1389
  • [7] What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
    Boyd, James
    Banzhaf, Spencer
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) : 616 - 626
  • [8] Reconciling biodiversity conservation and marine capture fisheries production
    Brander, Keith
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, 2 (5-6) : 416 - 421
  • [9] Chan Kai Ma, 2010, F1000 Biol Rep, V2, P54, DOI 10.3410/B2-54
  • [10] Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations
    Christensen, V
    Walters, CJ
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 172 (2-4) : 109 - 139